Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.57 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 11.0%
Rank
27th
of 44 groups
All-time high
7.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Upper middle income is 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 11.0% on the previous year and up 56.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 27th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0325 current US$ per square kilometre | +306.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0867 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0624 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0927 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0812 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1969 | 0.1356 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.1% |
| 1970 | 0.1933 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.5% |
| 1971 | 0.2395 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1972 | 0.275 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1973 | 0.516 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.6% |
| 1974 | 0.6418 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1975 | 0.8201 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 1976 | 0.8054 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1977 | 0.6628 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1978 | 0.6473 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1979 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.9% |
| 1980 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1981 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1982 | 0.959 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1983 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1984 | 0.8534 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1985 | 0.8201 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1986 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1987 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.7% |
| 1988 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1989 | 0.9185 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1990 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1991 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.2% |
| 1992 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1993 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1994 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 1995 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 1996 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1997 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1998 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1999 | 0.9996 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2001 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2002 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.4% |
| 2003 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2004 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 2005 | 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +331.5% |
| 2006 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.4% |
| 2007 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.6% |
| 2008 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.1% |
| 2009 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.4% |
| 2010 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 2011 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2012 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2013 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2015 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2016 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.3% |
| 2017 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2018 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 2019 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2020 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2021 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2022 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.6% |
| 2023 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0592 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1356 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.594 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1933 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8201 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9996 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 24 Samoa 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Ghana 22.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Niger 21.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Guatemala 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 27th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.