Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps was 2.28 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Brazil, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Brazil is 2.28 million current US$, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 26.3% on the previous year and up 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Brazil peaked at 11.43 million current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, -1.69 million current US$, in 1966.
Brazil ranks 83rd of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 2.23 million current US$ | — |
| 1963 | 1.05 million current US$ | -52.9% |
| 1964 | 4.25 million current US$ | +304.8% |
| 1965 | 920,000 current US$ | -78.4% |
| 1966 | -1.69 million current US$ | -283.7% |
| 1967 | -1.66 million current US$ | -1.8% |
| 1968 | -445,000 current US$ | -73.2% |
| 1969 | 770,000 current US$ | -273.0% |
| 1970 | 690,000 current US$ | -10.4% |
| 1971 | 2.40 million current US$ | +247.8% |
| 1972 | 2.67 million current US$ | +11.2% |
| 1973 | 1.85 million current US$ | -30.7% |
| 1974 | 1.08 million current US$ | -41.6% |
| 1975 | 2.26 million current US$ | +109.3% |
| 1976 | 3.35 million current US$ | +48.2% |
| 1977 | 1.18 million current US$ | -64.8% |
| 1978 | 2.08 million current US$ | +76.3% |
| 1979 | 1.89 million current US$ | -9.1% |
| 1980 | 1.51 million current US$ | -20.1% |
| 1981 | 2.73 million current US$ | +80.8% |
| 1982 | 3.81 million current US$ | +39.6% |
| 1983 | 2.05 million current US$ | -46.2% |
| 1984 | 7.08 million current US$ | +245.4% |
| 1985 | 5.80 million current US$ | -18.1% |
| 1986 | 4.44 million current US$ | -23.4% |
| 1987 | 3.57 million current US$ | -19.6% |
| 1988 | 4.04 million current US$ | +13.2% |
| 1989 | 3.94 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 1990 | 2.89 million current US$ | -26.6% |
| 1991 | 3.46 million current US$ | +19.7% |
| 1992 | 4.00 million current US$ | +15.6% |
| 1993 | 4.12 million current US$ | +3.0% |
| 1994 | 2.74 million current US$ | -33.5% |
| 1995 | 2.85 million current US$ | +4.0% |
| 1996 | 3.11 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1997 | 3.72 million current US$ | +19.6% |
| 1998 | 3.41 million current US$ | -8.3% |
| 1999 | 3.45 million current US$ | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 3.24 million current US$ | -6.1% |
| 2001 | 3.99 million current US$ | +23.1% |
| 2002 | 6.04 million current US$ | +51.4% |
| 2003 | 8.13 million current US$ | +34.6% |
| 2004 | 9.12 million current US$ | +12.2% |
| 2005 | 8.64 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2006 | 7.11 million current US$ | -17.7% |
| 2007 | 9.24 million current US$ | +30.0% |
| 2008 | 11.43 million current US$ | +23.7% |
| 2009 | 10.82 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2010 | 7.11 million current US$ | -34.3% |
| 2011 | 4.14 million current US$ | -41.8% |
| 2012 | 2.54 million current US$ | -38.6% |
| 2013 | 2.23 million current US$ | -12.3% |
| 2014 | 1.30 million current US$ | -41.6% |
| 2015 | 916,835 current US$ | -29.5% |
| 2016 | 852,046 current US$ | -7.1% |
| 2017 | 1.26 million current US$ | +48.3% |
| 2018 | 1.13 million current US$ | -10.6% |
| 2019 | 2.33 million current US$ | +106.3% |
| 2020 | 1.74 million current US$ | -25.2% |
| 2021 | 1.24 million current US$ | -28.6% |
| 2022 | 1.81 million current US$ | +45.3% |
| 2023 | 2.28 million current US$ | +26.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 678,125 current US$ | -1.69 million current US$ | 4.25 million current US$ | 8 |
| 1970s | 1.95 million current US$ | 690,000 current US$ | 3.35 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.90 million current US$ | 1.51 million current US$ | 7.08 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.38 million current US$ | 2.74 million current US$ | 4.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.78 million current US$ | 3.24 million current US$ | 11.43 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.38 million current US$ | 852,046 current US$ | 7.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.77 million current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 2.28 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 80 Congo 2.80 million current US$ compare
- 81 Nepal 2.45 million current US$ compare
- 82 Mauritania 2.37 million current US$ compare
- 84 Turks and Caicos Islands 2.16 million current US$ compare
- 85 Romania 1.88 million current US$ compare
- 86 Guinea-Bissau 1.77 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Brazil was 2.28 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 11.43 million current US$ in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.69 million current US$ in 1966.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 83rd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.