Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend
Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps was 907.63 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Early-demographic dividend recorded 907.63 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in 2022.
The figure is up 11.0% on the previous year and up 6.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend peaked at 1.22 billion current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 45.39 million current US$, in 2003.
That places Early-demographic dividend 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 176.19 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 166.52 million current US$ | -5.5% |
| 1972 | 165.51 million current US$ | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 184.11 million current US$ | +11.2% |
| 1974 | 272.05 million current US$ | +47.8% |
| 1975 | 333.11 million current US$ | +22.4% |
| 1976 | 245.91 million current US$ | -26.2% |
| 1977 | 228.67 million current US$ | -7.0% |
| 1978 | 283.64 million current US$ | +24.0% |
| 1979 | 217.31 million current US$ | -23.4% |
| 1980 | 226.67 million current US$ | +4.3% |
| 1981 | 293.43 million current US$ | +29.5% |
| 1982 | 337.06 million current US$ | +14.9% |
| 1983 | 331.34 million current US$ | -1.7% |
| 1984 | 418.07 million current US$ | +26.2% |
| 1985 | 392.01 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1986 | 352.18 million current US$ | -10.2% |
| 1987 | 403.17 million current US$ | +14.5% |
| 1988 | 507.54 million current US$ | +25.9% |
| 1989 | 422.90 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1990 | 486.35 million current US$ | +15.0% |
| 1991 | 512.67 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 1992 | 468.16 million current US$ | -8.7% |
| 1993 | 373.14 million current US$ | -20.3% |
| 1994 | 347.96 million current US$ | -6.7% |
| 1995 | 348.06 million current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 420.05 million current US$ | +20.7% |
| 1997 | 353.15 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 1998 | 281.90 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 1999 | 254.47 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 2000 | 237.68 million current US$ | -6.6% |
| 2001 | 227.23 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 246.15 million current US$ | +8.3% |
| 2003 | 45.39 million current US$ | -81.6% |
| 2004 | 453.69 million current US$ | +899.5% |
| 2005 | 694.75 million current US$ | +53.1% |
| 2006 | 594.03 million current US$ | -14.5% |
| 2007 | 781.92 million current US$ | +31.6% |
| 2008 | 893.17 million current US$ | +14.2% |
| 2009 | 724.01 million current US$ | -18.9% |
| 2010 | 1.22 billion current US$ | +68.4% |
| 2011 | 944.11 million current US$ | -22.6% |
| 2012 | 850.45 million current US$ | -9.9% |
| 2013 | 965.04 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 2014 | 794.62 million current US$ | -17.7% |
| 2015 | 766.37 million current US$ | -3.6% |
| 2016 | 667.03 million current US$ | -13.0% |
| 2017 | 717.88 million current US$ | +7.6% |
| 2018 | 804.25 million current US$ | +12.0% |
| 2019 | 708.98 million current US$ | -11.8% |
| 2020 | 685.38 million current US$ | -3.3% |
| 2021 | 817.91 million current US$ | +19.3% |
| 2022 | 907.63 million current US$ | +11.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 227.30 million current US$ | 165.51 million current US$ | 333.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 368.44 million current US$ | 226.67 million current US$ | 507.54 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 384.59 million current US$ | 254.47 million current US$ | 512.67 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 489.80 million current US$ | 45.39 million current US$ | 893.17 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 843.77 million current US$ | 667.03 million current US$ | 1.22 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 803.64 million current US$ | 685.38 million current US$ | 907.63 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Early-demographic dividend
- 17 Mozambique 55.62 million current US$ compare
- 18 Poland 49.56 million current US$ compare
- 19 Ghana 49.54 million current US$ compare
- 20 Yemen 44.13 million current US$ compare
- 21 Burkina Faso 43.93 million current US$ compare
- 22 Kenya 43.55 million current US$ compare
- 23 Afghanistan 43.34 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Early-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 171.18 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 148.03 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 907.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.23 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 543.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.19 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.32 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 374.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.62 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend was 907.63 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 1.22 billion current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 45.39 million current US$ in 2003.
- How does Early-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Early-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Early-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.