Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend

Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 584.04 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
584.04 million current US$
Change on year
up 2.3%
Rank
19th
of 45 groups
All-time high
636.47 million current US$
in 2013
All-time low
7.00 million current US$
in 1970
Years of data
53
1970–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, 1970–2022

0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend stood at 584.04 million current US$.

The figure is up 2.3% on the previous year and up 34.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend peaked at 636.47 million current US$ in 2013 and was at its lowest, 7.00 million current US$, in 1970.

That places Early-demographic dividend 19th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled in Early-demographic dividend, 1970 to 2022.
Year current US$ Change
1970 7.00 million current US$
1971 8.00 million current US$ +14.3%
1972 14.22 million current US$ +77.8%
1973 13.98 million current US$ -1.7%
1974 32.46 million current US$ +132.2%
1975 34.03 million current US$ +4.8%
1976 33.85 million current US$ -0.5%
1977 54.03 million current US$ +59.6%
1978 68.61 million current US$ +27.0%
1979 90.49 million current US$ +31.9%
1980 106.42 million current US$ +17.6%
1981 87.75 million current US$ -17.5%
1982 106.67 million current US$ +21.6%
1983 103.65 million current US$ -2.8%
1984 105.04 million current US$ +1.3%
1985 111.09 million current US$ +5.8%
1986 160.59 million current US$ +44.6%
1987 167.84 million current US$ +4.5%
1988 180.01 million current US$ +7.3%
1989 178.73 million current US$ -0.7%
1990 238.71 million current US$ +33.6%
1991 245.00 million current US$ +2.6%
1992 258.95 million current US$ +5.7%
1993 186.42 million current US$ -28.0%
1994 234.61 million current US$ +25.9%
1995 294.19 million current US$ +25.4%
1996 314.70 million current US$ +7.0%
1997 289.26 million current US$ -8.1%
1998 264.88 million current US$ -8.4%
1999 239.23 million current US$ -9.7%
2000 217.83 million current US$ -8.9%
2001 236.15 million current US$ +8.4%
2002 243.37 million current US$ +3.1%
2003 274.96 million current US$ +13.0%
2004 283.07 million current US$ +2.9%
2005 451.23 million current US$ +59.4%
2006 377.75 million current US$ -16.3%
2007 613.51 million current US$ +62.4%
2008 495.12 million current US$ -19.3%
2009 416.94 million current US$ -15.8%
2010 592.53 million current US$ +42.1%
2011 533.55 million current US$ -10.0%
2012 433.17 million current US$ -18.8%
2013 636.47 million current US$ +46.9%
2014 575.51 million current US$ -9.6%
2015 482.44 million current US$ -16.2%
2016 533.77 million current US$ +10.6%
2017 558.73 million current US$ +4.7%
2018 548.36 million current US$ -1.9%
2019 574.26 million current US$ +4.7%
2020 535.17 million current US$ -6.8%
2021 570.68 million current US$ +6.6%
2022 584.04 million current US$ +2.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 35.67 million current US$ 7.00 million current US$ 90.49 million current US$ 10
1980s 130.78 million current US$ 87.75 million current US$ 180.01 million current US$ 10
1990s 256.60 million current US$ 186.42 million current US$ 314.70 million current US$ 10
2000s 360.99 million current US$ 217.83 million current US$ 613.51 million current US$ 10
2010s 546.88 million current US$ 433.17 million current US$ 636.47 million current US$ 10
2020s 563.30 million current US$ 535.17 million current US$ 584.04 million current US$ 3

Countries ranked near Early-demographic dividend

  1. 16 Uganda 41.41 million current US$ compare
  2. 17 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 34.62 million current US$ compare
  3. 18 Nepal 33.10 million current US$ compare
  4. 19 Myanmar 32.65 million current US$ compare
  5. 20 Yemen 30.53 million current US$ compare
  6. 21 Brazil 29.86 million current US$ compare
  7. 22 Russian Federation 29.62 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Early-demographic dividend

All data for Early-demographic dividend →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend was 584.04 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
The highest recorded value was 636.47 million current US$ in 2013.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
The lowest recorded value was 7.00 million current US$ in 1970.
How does Early-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 19th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Early-demographic dividend?
Over the last ten years it is up 34.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Early-demographic dividend data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/early-demographic-dividend/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.