Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Philippines
Philippines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 1.85 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Philippines, 1969–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 1.85 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in 2023.
That represents a change of down 26.0% on the previous year and down 66.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Philippines peaked at 11.12 million current US$ in 2004 and was at its lowest, -3.56 million current US$, in 1998.
Philippines ranks 48th of 135 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Philippines, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1970 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1.13 million current US$ | +11200.0% |
| 1973 | 1.76 million current US$ | +55.8% |
| 1974 | 3.24 million current US$ | +84.1% |
| 1975 | 1.73 million current US$ | -46.6% |
| 1976 | 870,000 current US$ | -49.7% |
| 1977 | 1.18 million current US$ | +35.6% |
| 1978 | 3.51 million current US$ | +197.5% |
| 1979 | 170,000 current US$ | -95.2% |
| 1980 | 2.45 million current US$ | +1341.2% |
| 1981 | 9.55 million current US$ | +289.8% |
| 1982 | -370,000 current US$ | -103.9% |
| 1983 | -110,000 current US$ | -70.3% |
| 1984 | 20,000 current US$ | -118.2% |
| 1985 | 1.44 million current US$ | +7100.0% |
| 1986 | 2.50 million current US$ | +73.6% |
| 1987 | 2.69 million current US$ | +7.6% |
| 1988 | 4.37 million current US$ | +62.5% |
| 1989 | 770,000 current US$ | -82.4% |
| 1990 | 3.31 million current US$ | +329.9% |
| 1991 | 3.62 million current US$ | +9.4% |
| 1992 | 3.16 million current US$ | -12.7% |
| 1993 | 2.20 million current US$ | -30.4% |
| 1994 | 1.32 million current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1995 | 1.71 million current US$ | +29.5% |
| 1996 | 5.16 million current US$ | +201.8% |
| 1997 | 3.89 million current US$ | -24.6% |
| 1998 | -3.56 million current US$ | -191.5% |
| 1999 | 4.21 million current US$ | -218.3% |
| 2000 | 6.88 million current US$ | +63.4% |
| 2001 | 5.53 million current US$ | -19.6% |
| 2002 | 2.16 million current US$ | -60.9% |
| 2003 | 930,000 current US$ | -56.9% |
| 2004 | 11.12 million current US$ | +1095.7% |
| 2005 | -310,000 current US$ | -102.8% |
| 2006 | -450,000 current US$ | +45.2% |
| 2007 | 3.65 million current US$ | -911.1% |
| 2008 | 2.09 million current US$ | -42.7% |
| 2009 | -200,000 current US$ | -109.6% |
| 2010 | 2.27 million current US$ | -1235.0% |
| 2011 | 1.98 million current US$ | -12.8% |
| 2012 | 264,599 current US$ | -86.6% |
| 2013 | 5.47 million current US$ | +1965.6% |
| 2014 | 402,406 current US$ | -92.6% |
| 2015 | 337,589 current US$ | -16.1% |
| 2016 | 49,545 current US$ | -85.3% |
| 2017 | -16,120 current US$ | -132.5% |
| 2018 | 331,350 current US$ | -2155.5% |
| 2019 | 575,385 current US$ | +73.6% |
| 2020 | 720,049 current US$ | +25.1% |
| 2021 | 539,450 current US$ | -25.1% |
| 2022 | 2.50 million current US$ | +364.3% |
| 2023 | 1.85 million current US$ | -26.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1 |
| 1970s | 1.36 million current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 3.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.33 million current US$ | -370,000 current US$ | 9.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.50 million current US$ | -3.56 million current US$ | 5.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.14 million current US$ | -450,000 current US$ | 11.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.17 million current US$ | -16,120 current US$ | 5.47 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.40 million current US$ | 539,450 current US$ | 2.50 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
More aid effectiveness data for Philippines
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 953,487 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 153.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -19,124 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.00 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Philippines?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Philippines was 1.85 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 11.12 million current US$ in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.56 million current US$ in 1998.
- How does Philippines rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Philippines ranks 48th out of 135 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.