Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in South Asia

South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 29.05 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
29.05 million current US$
Change on year
down 25.2%
Rank
31st
of 46 groups
All-time high
155.49 million current US$
in 2010
All-time low
0 current US$
in 1962
Years of data
64
1960–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in South Asia, 1960–2023

050.0M100.0M150.0M196019912023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in South Asia is 29.05 million current US$, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.2% on the previous year and down 58.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in South Asia peaked at 155.49 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$, in 1962.

South Asia ranks 31st of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in South Asia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled in South Asia, 1960 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1960 20,000 current US$
1961 10,000 current US$ -50.0%
1962 0 current US$ -100.0%
1963 0 current US$
1964 900,000 current US$
1965 80,000 current US$ -91.1%
1966 4.67 million current US$ +5737.5%
1967 3.91 million current US$ -16.3%
1968 2.62 million current US$ -33.0%
1969 6.98 million current US$ +166.4%
1970 3.02 million current US$ -56.7%
1971 4.06 million current US$ +34.4%
1972 6.38 million current US$ +57.1%
1973 11.40 million current US$ +78.7%
1974 16.24 million current US$ +42.5%
1975 15.50 million current US$ -4.6%
1976 14.88 million current US$ -4.0%
1977 25.82 million current US$ +73.5%
1978 48.22 million current US$ +86.8%
1979 38.82 million current US$ -19.5%
1980 60.77 million current US$ +56.5%
1981 38.21 million current US$ -37.1%
1982 48.32 million current US$ +26.5%
1983 67.75 million current US$ +40.2%
1984 55.30 million current US$ -18.4%
1985 69.27 million current US$ +25.3%
1986 79.04 million current US$ +14.1%
1987 83.21 million current US$ +5.3%
1988 87.26 million current US$ +4.9%
1989 109.95 million current US$ +26.0%
1990 109.97 million current US$ +0.0%
1991 113.78 million current US$ +3.5%
1992 86.44 million current US$ -24.0%
1993 84.17 million current US$ -2.6%
1994 104.82 million current US$ +24.5%
1995 97.34 million current US$ -7.1%
1996 110.22 million current US$ +13.2%
1997 102.71 million current US$ -6.8%
1998 120.90 million current US$ +17.7%
1999 109.26 million current US$ -9.6%
2000 88.95 million current US$ -18.6%
2001 98.62 million current US$ +10.9%
2002 81.71 million current US$ -17.1%
2003 37.29 million current US$ -54.4%
2004 113.20 million current US$ +203.6%
2005 125.93 million current US$ +11.2%
2006 120.16 million current US$ -4.6%
2007 112.73 million current US$ -6.2%
2008 137.02 million current US$ +21.5%
2009 143.59 million current US$ +4.8%
2010 155.49 million current US$ +8.3%
2011 119.74 million current US$ -23.0%
2012 117.28 million current US$ -2.1%
2013 69.23 million current US$ -41.0%
2014 66.47 million current US$ -4.0%
2015 32.65 million current US$ -50.9%
2016 34.29 million current US$ +5.0%
2017 55.41 million current US$ +61.6%
2018 47.93 million current US$ -13.5%
2019 19.13 million current US$ -60.1%
2020 21.54 million current US$ +12.6%
2021 31.79 million current US$ +47.6%
2022 38.83 million current US$ +22.1%
2023 29.05 million current US$ -25.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 1.92 million current US$ 0 current US$ 6.98 million current US$ 10
1970s 18.43 million current US$ 3.02 million current US$ 48.22 million current US$ 10
1980s 69.91 million current US$ 38.21 million current US$ 109.95 million current US$ 10
1990s 103.96 million current US$ 84.17 million current US$ 120.90 million current US$ 10
2000s 105.92 million current US$ 37.29 million current US$ 143.59 million current US$ 10
2010s 71.76 million current US$ 19.13 million current US$ 155.49 million current US$ 10
2020s 30.30 million current US$ 21.54 million current US$ 38.83 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near South Asia

  1. 28 Chile 4.58 million current US$ compare
  2. 29 Ghana 3.85 million current US$ compare
  3. 30 Slovakia 3.83 million current US$ compare
  4. 31 Pakistan 3.81 million current US$ compare
  5. 32 Zimbabwe 3.66 million current US$ compare
  6. 33 Indonesia 3.57 million current US$ compare
  7. 34 Cuba 3.43 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 181 places →

More aid effectiveness data for South Asia

All data for South Asia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in South Asia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in South Asia was 29.05 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in South Asia?
The highest recorded value was 155.49 million current US$ in 2010.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in South Asia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ in 1962.
How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
South Asia ranks 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in South Asia?
Over the last ten years it is down 58.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this South Asia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in South Asia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in South Asia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.