Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.4333 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) recorded 0.4333 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 5.1% on the previous year and up 555.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -0.0952 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2013.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 41st of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0245 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 1969 | 0.1579 current US$ per square kilometre | +1756.3% |
| 1970 | 0.2871 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0314 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0447 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 1973 | 0.1069 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0622 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.8% |
| 1975 | 0.142 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.2% |
| 1976 | 0.1664 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1977 | 0.2701 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.3% |
| 1978 | 0.1707 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1979 | 0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1980 | 0.2265 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 1981 | 0.1755 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1982 | 0.1733 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1983 | 0.2786 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.7% |
| 1984 | 0.1436 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1985 | 0.2999 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.9% |
| 1986 | 0.2122 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.3% |
| 1987 | 0.747 current US$ per square kilometre | +252.1% |
| 1988 | 0.7885 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1989 | 0.6152 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 1990 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.0% |
| 1991 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1992 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1994 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1995 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1996 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1997 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1998 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1999 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2000 | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2002 | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2003 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2004 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2005 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2006 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2007 | 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2008 | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2010 | 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 2011 | 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2012 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2013 | -0.0952 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.2% |
| 2014 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -2109.2% |
| 2015 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2016 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2017 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.8% |
| 2018 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.8% |
| 2019 | 0.2529 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.6% |
| 2020 | 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2021 | 0.216 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2022 | 0.4568 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.5% |
| 2023 | 0.4333 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1579 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1444 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0314 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2871 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.366 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1436 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7885 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0952 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3456 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.216 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4568 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 38 Samoa 17.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Ghana 16.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Tanzania, United Republic of 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Djibouti 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Singapore 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Mauritius 14.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Myanmar 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 0.4333 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0952 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 41st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 555.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.