Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Upper middle income stood at 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 17.9% on the previous year and up 571.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
Upper middle income ranks 29th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.003 current US$ per square kilometre | -123.5% |
| 1963 | -0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1964 | -0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0177 current US$ per square kilometre | -336.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0142 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0257 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0242 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1969 | 0.1081 current US$ per square kilometre | +346.4% |
| 1970 | 0.1326 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1971 | 0.1276 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1141 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1973 | 0.1199 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1974 | 0.1154 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1975 | 0.2547 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.8% |
| 1976 | 0.1778 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1977 | 0.1586 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0947 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 1979 | 0.487 current US$ per square kilometre | +414.5% |
| 1980 | 0.1364 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.0% |
| 1981 | 0.2527 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.3% |
| 1982 | 0.3571 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1983 | 0.2735 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1984 | 0.1149 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.0% |
| 1985 | 0.3846 current US$ per square kilometre | +234.8% |
| 1986 | 0.9847 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.0% |
| 1987 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1988 | 0.765 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 1989 | 0.8728 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1990 | 0.7015 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1991 | 0.4787 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 1992 | 0.9288 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.0% |
| 1993 | 0.6287 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1994 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.0% |
| 1995 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1996 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.5% |
| 1997 | 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1998 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.8% |
| 1999 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2000 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2001 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 2002 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2003 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 2004 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.3% |
| 2005 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2006 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2007 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 2008 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 2009 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2010 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2011 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2012 | 0.5645 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 2013 | 0.797 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 2014 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 2015 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 2016 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2017 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.9% |
| 2018 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2019 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2020 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2021 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 2022 | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.7% |
| 2023 | 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0211 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1081 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1782 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0947 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.487 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5357 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1149 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4787 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5645 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 26 Poland 29.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Iraq 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Mali 26.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Burundi 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Serbia 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Lithuania 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Niger 22.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 29th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 571.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.