Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo
Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
104.76 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 184.0%
World rank
121st
of 170 countries
All-time high
163.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
-0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1987
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo stood at 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 184.0% on the previous year and up 57.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo peaked at 163.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, -0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
Congo ranks 121st of 170 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +2463.6% |
| 1963 | 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1964 | 17.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.0% |
| 1965 | 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 1966 | 9.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1967 | 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.0% |
| 1968 | 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1969 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 1970 | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.9% |
| 1971 | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1972 | 13.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1973 | 13.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1974 | 23.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.4% |
| 1975 | 28.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1976 | 38.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 1977 | 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.2% |
| 1978 | 39.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.3% |
| 1979 | 36.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1980 | 21.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.3% |
| 1981 | 14.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1982 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 1983 | 18.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +287.3% |
| 1984 | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1985 | 47.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.0% |
| 1986 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.5% |
| 1987 | -0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.1% |
| 1988 | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -2227.3% |
| 1989 | 13 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.7% |
| 1990 | 27.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.7% |
| 1991 | 23.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1992 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1993 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.1% |
| 1994 | 17.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +330.4% |
| 1995 | 47.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.4% |
| 1996 | 29.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1997 | 12.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.4% |
| 1998 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.4% |
| 1999 | 6.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.4% |
| 2000 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2001 | 6.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 2002 | 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +191.2% |
| 2003 | 27.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2004 | 37.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 2005 | 46.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2006 | 163.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +251.3% |
| 2007 | 109.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 2008 | 138.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2009 | 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 2010 | 94.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 2011 | 75.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2012 | 116.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.4% |
| 2013 | 66.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2014 | 83.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2015 | 56.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 2016 | 40.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 2017 | 32.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2018 | 58.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.1% |
| 2019 | 42.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2020 | 42.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 27.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 2022 | 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2023 | 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 23.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 63.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 163.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 66.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 52.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 118 Trinidad and Tobago 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Mali 107.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Chad 106.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Zimbabwe 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Bhutan 87.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Viet Nam 75.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 18,209 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 891,418 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 542,370 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 677,421 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 96.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42,394 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.01 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo was 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 163.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Congo ranks 121st out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.