Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago, 1971–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago is 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2010.
The figure is down 64.8% on the previous year and up 108.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 6,517 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, -2,930 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2002.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 170 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1978 | 212.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +1457.1% |
| 1979 | 323.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 1980 | 103.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.1% |
| 1981 | 72.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1982 | 105.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.9% |
| 1983 | 202.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 1984 | 105.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.1% |
| 1985 | 699.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +564.8% |
| 1986 | 113.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.8% |
| 1987 | 62.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 1988 | 85.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1989 | 230.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.2% |
| 1990 | 1,774 current US$ per square kilometre | +671.2% |
| 1991 | 265.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.1% |
| 1992 | 1,466 current US$ per square kilometre | +452.9% |
| 1993 | 378.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.2% |
| 1994 | 3,844 current US$ per square kilometre | +916.5% |
| 1995 | 4,643 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1996 | 3,039 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.6% |
| 1997 | 6,517 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.4% |
| 1998 | 3,191 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.0% |
| 1999 | 5,004 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 2000 | -1,288 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.7% |
| 2001 | -2,060 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.9% |
| 2002 | -2,930 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 2003 | -1,686 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.4% |
| 2004 | -1,844 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2005 | -1,924 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2006 | 1,427 current US$ per square kilometre | -174.2% |
| 2007 | 2,136 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 2008 | 943.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 2009 | 309.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 2010 | 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 138.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 323.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1980s | 177.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 699.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,012 current US$ per square kilometre | 265.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,517 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -691.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -2,930 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,136 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 115 Niger 115.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Paraguay 111.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Mali 107.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Chad 106.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Congo 104.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2000)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 330,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 560,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 90,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 370,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 480,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 4.08 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Trinidad and Tobago was 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 6,517 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was -2,930 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th out of 170 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is up 108.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.