Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
109.8 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 22.4%
World rank
117th
of 170 countries
All-time high
160.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2023.
The figure is up 22.4% on the previous year and down 25.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 160.68 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Congo, Democratic Republic of the 117th out of 170 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4279 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.9% |
| 1963 | 0.5823 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.1% |
| 1964 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.7% |
| 1965 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 1966 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1967 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 1968 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 1969 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.8% |
| 1970 | 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.9% |
| 1971 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.4% |
| 1972 | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1973 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1974 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1975 | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.6% |
| 1976 | 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1977 | 13.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.3% |
| 1978 | 8.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 1979 | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1980 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1981 | 19.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.4% |
| 1982 | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 1983 | 22.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.1% |
| 1984 | 15.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1985 | 9.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1986 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1987 | 9.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1988 | 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.5% |
| 1989 | 23.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 1990 | 22.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1991 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.1% |
| 1992 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1993 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.5% |
| 1994 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.7% |
| 1995 | 9.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.8% |
| 1996 | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1997 | 4.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.3% |
| 1998 | 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1999 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.8% |
| 2000 | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +449.9% |
| 2001 | 19.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 2002 | 31.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.1% |
| 2003 | 35.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2004 | 110.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +212.0% |
| 2005 | 94.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2006 | 98.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2007 | 69.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2008 | 98.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.9% |
| 2009 | 102.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 160.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.5% |
| 2011 | 138.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2012 | 125.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2013 | 148.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2014 | 93.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2015 | 86.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2016 | 91.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2017 | 76.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2018 | 91.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2019 | 90.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 84.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2021 | 94.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2022 | 89.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 67.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 110.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 110.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 160.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 94.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 114 Myanmar 121.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Niger 115.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Paraguay 111.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Trinidad and Tobago 109.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Mali 107.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Chad 106.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 109.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 160.68 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 117th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.