Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 113.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
113.14 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 37.1%
Rank
32nd
of 45 groups
All-time high
224.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia stood at 113.14 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 37.1% on the previous year and up 8.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia peaked at 224.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
South Asia ranks 32nd of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1971 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.3% |
| 1972 | 8.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.7% |
| 1973 | 12.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.6% |
| 1974 | 27.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.5% |
| 1975 | 51.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.3% |
| 1976 | 9.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.4% |
| 1977 | 25.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.3% |
| 1978 | 19.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1979 | 18.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1980 | 37.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.3% |
| 1981 | 68.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.6% |
| 1982 | 51.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 1983 | 40.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1984 | 48.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1985 | 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 1986 | 28.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1987 | 48.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.7% |
| 1988 | 65.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 1989 | 66.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1990 | 41.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 1991 | 30.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1992 | 44.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 1993 | 35.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1994 | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 57.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 1996 | 69.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1997 | 57.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1998 | 44.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1999 | 48.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2000 | 44.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2001 | 53 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2002 | 45.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2003 | 44.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2004 | 71.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 2005 | 88.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2006 | 111.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2007 | 87.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2008 | 149.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.0% |
| 2009 | 105.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2010 | 117.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2011 | 100.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2012 | 93.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2013 | 104.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2014 | 68.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2015 | 156.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.2% |
| 2016 | 171.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2017 | 224.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 2018 | 207.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2019 | 133.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2020 | 176.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2021 | 171.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2022 | 179.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2023 | 113.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2738 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 17.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 48.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 46.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 80.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 149.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 137.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 224.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 160.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 179.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 29 Bulgaria 3,261 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Saint Lucia 3,078 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Czechia 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Romania 3,021 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Maldives 2,940 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Singapore 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia was 113.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 224.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- South Asia ranks 32nd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.