Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Africa Western and Central

Africa Western and Central: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) was 211.75 % change on previous year in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
211.75 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 707.5%
Rank
3rd
of 46 groups
All-time high
366 % change on previous year
in 1986
All-time low
-80.85 % change on previous year
in 1993
Years of data
48
1972–2019

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Africa Western and Central, 1972–2019

-1000100200300400197219952019

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Africa Western and Central recorded 211.75 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 707.5% on the previous year and up 1,326.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Africa Western and Central peaked at 366 % change on previous year in 1986 and was at its lowest, -80.85 % change on previous year, in 1993.

That places Africa Western and Central 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Africa Western and Central, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate in Africa Western and Central, 1972 to 2019.
Year % change on previous year Change
1972 360 % change on previous year
1973 234.78 % change on previous year -34.8%
1974 -35.06 % change on previous year -114.9%
1975 50 % change on previous year -242.6%
1976 -64 % change on previous year -228.0%
1977 14.81 % change on previous year -123.1%
1978 -22.58 % change on previous year -252.4%
1979 45.83 % change on previous year -303.0%
1980 22.86 % change on previous year -50.1%
1981 288.37 % change on previous year +1161.6%
1982 -2.99 % change on previous year -101.0%
1983 -31.48 % change on previous year +951.5%
1984 37.84 % change on previous year -220.2%
1985 -67.32 % change on previous year -277.9%
1986 366 % change on previous year -643.7%
1987 38.63 % change on previous year -89.4%
1988 -25.08 % change on previous year -164.9%
1989 -12.4 % change on previous year -50.6%
1990 76.42 % change on previous year -716.4%
1991 163.64 % change on previous year +114.1%
1992 2.74 % change on previous year -98.3%
1993 -80.85 % change on previous year -3052.5%
1994 -4.64 % change on previous year -94.3%
1995 29.19 % change on previous year -729.2%
1996 24.69 % change on previous year -15.4%
1997 -28.86 % change on previous year -216.9%
1998 49.53 % change on previous year -271.6%
1999 8.83 % change on previous year -82.2%
2000 -4.35 % change on previous year -149.2%
2001 68.48 % change on previous year -1675.1%
2002 -13.13 % change on previous year -119.2%
2003 21.33 % change on previous year -262.4%
2004 63.65 % change on previous year +198.5%
2005 -7.4 % change on previous year -111.6%
2006 -9.01 % change on previous year +21.7%
2007 73.76 % change on previous year -918.8%
2008 2.21 % change on previous year -97.0%
2009 14.84 % change on previous year +572.3%
2010 1.21 % change on previous year -91.8%
2011 31.06 % change on previous year +2459.0%
2012 -12.21 % change on previous year -139.3%
2013 -11.93 % change on previous year -2.3%
2014 23.14 % change on previous year -293.9%
2015 -41.13 % change on previous year -277.8%
2016 -19.51 % change on previous year -52.6%
2017 -11.26 % change on previous year -42.3%
2018 -34.86 % change on previous year +209.6%
2019 211.75 % change on previous year -707.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 72.97 % change on previous year -64 % change on previous year 360 % change on previous year 8
1980s 61.44 % change on previous year -67.32 % change on previous year 366 % change on previous year 10
1990s 24.07 % change on previous year -80.85 % change on previous year 163.64 % change on previous year 10
2000s 21.04 % change on previous year -13.13 % change on previous year 73.76 % change on previous year 10
2010s 13.63 % change on previous year -41.13 % change on previous year 211.75 % change on previous year 10

Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central

  1. 1 Morocco 500.48 % change on previous year compare
  2. 2 Niger 429.91 % change on previous year compare
  3. 3 Jordan 419.63 % change on previous year compare
  4. 4 Jamaica 300 % change on previous year compare
  5. 5 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 296.74 % change on previous year compare
  6. 6 Malaysia 262.69 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 178 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central

All data for Africa Western and Central →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Africa Western and Central?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Africa Western and Central was 211.75 % change on previous year in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Africa Western and Central?
The highest recorded value was 366 % change on previous year in 1986.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Africa Western and Central?
The lowest recorded value was -80.85 % change on previous year in 1993.
How does Africa Western and Central rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$)?
Africa Western and Central ranks 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2019.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
Over the last ten years it is up 1,326.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Africa Western and Central. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/africa-western-and-central/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/africa-western-and-central/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Africa Western and Central</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,934 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.