Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries

Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps was 176.20 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
176.20 million current US$
Change on year
down 17.1%
Rank
9th
of 46 groups
All-time high
325.06 million current US$
in 2014
All-time low
1.25 million current US$
in 1971
Years of data
52
1971–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, 1971–2022

0100.0M200.0M300.0M197119962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries is 176.20 million current US$, measured in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.1% on the previous year and down 34.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries peaked at 325.06 million current US$ in 2014 and was at its lowest, 1.25 million current US$, in 1971.

Least developed countries ranks 9th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled in Least developed countries, 1971 to 2022.
Year current US$ Change
1971 1.25 million current US$
1972 3.76 million current US$ +200.8%
1973 5.20 million current US$ +38.3%
1974 9.57 million current US$ +84.0%
1975 15.71 million current US$ +64.2%
1976 22.68 million current US$ +44.4%
1977 19.20 million current US$ -15.3%
1978 18.57 million current US$ -3.3%
1979 24.92 million current US$ +34.2%
1980 34.42 million current US$ +38.1%
1981 36.47 million current US$ +6.0%
1982 36.91 million current US$ +1.2%
1983 49.56 million current US$ +34.3%
1984 53.62 million current US$ +8.2%
1985 60.35 million current US$ +12.6%
1986 94.94 million current US$ +57.3%
1987 126.08 million current US$ +32.8%
1988 192.68 million current US$ +52.8%
1989 197.62 million current US$ +2.6%
1990 194.61 million current US$ -1.5%
1991 197.44 million current US$ +1.5%
1992 147.76 million current US$ -25.2%
1993 60.57 million current US$ -59.0%
1994 75.72 million current US$ +25.0%
1995 66.33 million current US$ -12.4%
1996 65.37 million current US$ -1.4%
1997 54.03 million current US$ -17.3%
1998 67.97 million current US$ +25.8%
1999 64.81 million current US$ -4.6%
2000 65.57 million current US$ +1.2%
2001 70.55 million current US$ +7.6%
2002 78.31 million current US$ +11.0%
2003 99.22 million current US$ +26.7%
2004 124.43 million current US$ +25.4%
2005 137.92 million current US$ +10.8%
2006 161.50 million current US$ +17.1%
2007 207.58 million current US$ +28.5%
2008 232.24 million current US$ +11.9%
2009 267.75 million current US$ +15.3%
2010 283.19 million current US$ +5.8%
2011 274.81 million current US$ -3.0%
2012 268.04 million current US$ -2.5%
2013 291.29 million current US$ +8.7%
2014 325.06 million current US$ +11.6%
2015 235.73 million current US$ -27.5%
2016 195.43 million current US$ -17.1%
2017 165.72 million current US$ -15.2%
2018 132.86 million current US$ -19.8%
2019 177.75 million current US$ +33.8%
2020 210.04 million current US$ +18.2%
2021 212.62 million current US$ +1.2%
2022 176.20 million current US$ -17.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 13.43 million current US$ 1.25 million current US$ 24.92 million current US$ 9
1980s 88.27 million current US$ 34.42 million current US$ 197.62 million current US$ 10
1990s 99.46 million current US$ 54.03 million current US$ 197.44 million current US$ 10
2000s 144.51 million current US$ 65.57 million current US$ 267.75 million current US$ 10
2010s 234.99 million current US$ 132.86 million current US$ 325.06 million current US$ 10
2020s 199.62 million current US$ 176.20 million current US$ 212.62 million current US$ 3

Countries ranked near Least developed countries

  1. 6 Somalia 19.24 million current US$ compare
  2. 7 Nepal 18.66 million current US$ compare
  3. 8 Mozambique 17.81 million current US$ compare
  4. 9 Syrian Arab Republic 17.65 million current US$ compare
  5. 10 Tanzania, United Republic of 14.61 million current US$ compare
  6. 11 Myanmar 13.49 million current US$ compare
  7. 12 Palestine, State of 9.32 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries

All data for Least developed countries →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries was 176.20 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
The highest recorded value was 325.06 million current US$ in 2014.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
The lowest recorded value was 1.25 million current US$ in 1971.
How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
Least developed countries ranks 9th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Least developed countries?
Over the last ten years it is down 34.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,075 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.