Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Guatemala, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Guatemala stood at 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 185.6% on the previous year and up 11.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Guatemala peaked at 205 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.5599 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1982.
Guatemala ranks 96th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1982 | 0.5599 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.9% |
| 1983 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +566.7% |
| 1984 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1985 | 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1986 | 32.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +682.2% |
| 1987 | 113.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +244.6% |
| 1988 | 29.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.2% |
| 1989 | 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.9% |
| 1990 | 18.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1991 | 24.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1992 | 18.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 1993 | 21.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1994 | 17.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1995 | 36.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.8% |
| 1996 | 19.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 1997 | 14.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1998 | 31.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.0% |
| 1999 | 41.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2000 | 13.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 2001 | 14.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2002 | 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2003 | 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2004 | 22.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.8% |
| 2005 | 31.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.8% |
| 2006 | 33.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2007 | 26.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2008 | 24.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2009 | 26.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2010 | 30.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2011 | 30.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 32.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2013 | 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2014 | 31.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2015 | 23.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2016 | 26 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2017 | 27.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2018 | 34.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2019 | 205 current US$ per square kilometre | +487.5% |
| 2020 | 21.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.3% |
| 2021 | 17.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 2022 | 14.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2023 | 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 21 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5599 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 24.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 22.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 47.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 205 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 23.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 93 Nepal 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Iraq 45.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Türkiye 40.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Bosnia and Herzegovina 39.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 98 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 38.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 99 Afghanistan 36.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Guatemala was 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 205 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5599 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Guatemala ranks 96th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.