Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nepal
Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nepal, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nepal stood at 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.2% on the previous year and up 334.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nepal peaked at 237.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, -23.79 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2009.
Nepal ranks 93rd of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nepal, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1982 | 22.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +1683.3% |
| 1983 | 14.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1984 | 17.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1985 | 12.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1986 | 24.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.7% |
| 1987 | 15.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 1988 | 38.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +149.3% |
| 1989 | 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.0% |
| 1990 | 237.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 1991 | 103.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 1992 | 150.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 1993 | 42.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.1% |
| 1994 | 27.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1995 | 20.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1996 | 13.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1997 | 24.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.9% |
| 1998 | 22.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1999 | 13.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 2000 | 13.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2001 | -4.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -131.0% |
| 2002 | -13.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +214.8% |
| 2003 | -6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.7% |
| 2004 | -15.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.5% |
| 2005 | -15.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2006 | -16.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | -16.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2008 | -19.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2009 | -23.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2010 | -22.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2011 | -23.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | -14.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 2013 | -20.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 2014 | -18.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2015 | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.6% |
| 2016 | -2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.3% |
| 2017 | 5.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -338.0% |
| 2018 | 0.334 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 2019 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +962.0% |
| 2020 | 10.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +208.0% |
| 2021 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 2022 | 37.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +361.2% |
| 2023 | 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 27.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 65.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 237.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
- 90 Estonia 53.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Niger 49.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 92 Algeria 47.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Iraq 45.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Turkey 40.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Guatemala 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Nepal
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 339,536 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 47.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 65.44 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nepal?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nepal was 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 237.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was -23.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- How does Nepal rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Nepal ranks 93rd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 334.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.