Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.19 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 35.6%
Rank
44th
of 45 groups
All-time high
19.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1991
All-time low
-0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
High income recorded 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 35.6% on the previous year and up 217.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in High income peaked at 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, -0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2021.
High income ranks 44th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0712 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0569 current US$ per square kilometre | +566.7% |
| 1966 | 0.9366 current US$ per square kilometre | +1545.0% |
| 1967 | 0.8114 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1968 | 0.9309 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1969 | 0.9992 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1970 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1971 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 1972 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.4% |
| 1973 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 1974 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1975 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1976 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1977 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1978 | 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 1979 | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.9% |
| 1980 | 10.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1981 | 8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1982 | 9.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1983 | 10.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1984 | 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1985 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1986 | 14.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1987 | 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1988 | 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1989 | 17.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 17.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1992 | 14.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1993 | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1994 | 16.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1995 | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1996 | 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1997 | 14.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1998 | 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1999 | 13.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2000 | 0.4325 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.8% |
| 2001 | 0.6562 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 2002 | 0.6459 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2003 | 0.7118 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.8936 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2005 | 0.7734 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0.6675 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2007 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 2008 | 0.5283 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.1% |
| 2009 | 0.4621 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2010 | 0.6095 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2011 | 0.3073 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3784 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2013 | 0.3739 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.3607 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2015 | 0.2708 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0591 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.2% |
| 2017 | 0.267 current US$ per square kilometre | +351.8% |
| 2018 | 0.1052 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.6% |
| 2019 | 0.8702 current US$ per square kilometre | +727.5% |
| 2020 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +216.8% |
| 2021 | -0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.6% |
| 2022 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -4207.8% |
| 2023 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4248 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9992 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 15.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6789 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4325 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3602 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0591 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8702 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 41 Cameroon 309.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Azerbaijan 302.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Tunisia 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Congo 282.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Sao Tome and Principe 275.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Cyprus 266.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Bulgaria 227.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in High income was 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- High income ranks 44th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 217.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.