Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 31.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
31.38 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.6%
World rank
112th
of 171 countries
All-time high
96.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
All-time low
0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Bolivia, Plurinational State of recorded 31.38 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 5.6% on the previous year and down 13.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 96.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Bolivia, Plurinational State of 112th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +3328.6% |
| 1963 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1964 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1965 | 0.6554 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.4% |
| 1966 | 0.997 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1967 | 0.997 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.8% |
| 1969 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1970 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.4% |
| 1971 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 1972 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1973 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1974 | 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.8% |
| 1975 | 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.6% |
| 1976 | 18.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.7% |
| 1977 | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1978 | 11.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1980 | 19.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1981 | 26.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1982 | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.5% |
| 1983 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1984 | 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1985 | 10.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1986 | 18.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.6% |
| 1987 | 28.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1988 | 27.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1989 | 44.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.8% |
| 1990 | 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1991 | 74.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1992 | 74.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1993 | 86.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1994 | 62.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1995 | 63.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1996 | 96.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 1997 | 43.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 1998 | 57.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 1999 | 54.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2000 | 41.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2001 | 47.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2002 | 66.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 2003 | 40.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 2004 | 69.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.9% |
| 2005 | 47.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 2006 | 43.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2007 | 36.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2008 | 48.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2009 | 42.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2010 | 39.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2011 | 36.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2012 | 28.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2013 | 36.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 2014 | 40 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2015 | 27.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 2016 | 30.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2017 | 39.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 2018 | 43.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2019 | 33.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2020 | 28.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 2021 | 34.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 2022 | 29.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 2023 | 31.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 66.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 96.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 48.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 35.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 31.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- 109 Lesotho 33.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Chile 33.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Mauritania 31.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Thailand 31.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 El Salvador 29.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Chad 28.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 31.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 96.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 112th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.