Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Ecuador, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Ecuador stood at 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Ecuador peaked at 197.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Ecuador ranks 74th of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.4696 current US$ per square kilometre | +225.0% |
| 1964 | 0.2167 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 1965 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +600.0% |
| 1966 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.5% |
| 1967 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.1% |
| 1968 | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 1969 | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.8% |
| 1970 | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.3% |
| 1971 | 19.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1972 | 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 1973 | 17.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.7% |
| 1974 | 26.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.6% |
| 1975 | 27.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1976 | 29.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1977 | 35.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1978 | 27.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1979 | 40.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 1980 | 41.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1981 | 46.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1982 | 46.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1983 | 32.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1984 | 26.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1985 | 31.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1986 | 49.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.5% |
| 1987 | 66.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 1988 | 68.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 60.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1990 | 75.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1991 | 82.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1992 | 86.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1993 | 58.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 1994 | 78.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1995 | 101.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1996 | 97.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1997 | 57.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 1998 | 43.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1999 | 58.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.6% |
| 2000 | 45.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2001 | 55.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2002 | 66.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2003 | 67.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2004 | 57.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2005 | 68.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2006 | 66.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 88.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 2008 | 99.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2009 | 99.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 111.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2011 | 165.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.9% |
| 2012 | 146.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2013 | 128.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2014 | 146.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2015 | 122.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2016 | 105 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2017 | 120.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2018 | 197.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.4% |
| 2019 | 175.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2020 | 132.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2021 | 172.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2022 | 124 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 2023 | 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 24.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 47.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 73.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 71.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 99.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 141.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 105 current US$ per square kilometre | 197.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 137.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 172.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 71 Nigeria 130.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 Kyrgyzstan 127.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Palau 125.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Georgia 118.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Laos 116.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Cape Verde 115.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Ecuador was 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 197.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Ecuador ranks 74th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.