Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Least developed countries
Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) was -0.134 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Least developed countries, 1975–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Least developed countries stood at -0.134 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of down 101.5% on the previous year and up 99.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Least developed countries peaked at 186.67 % change on previous year in 1976 and was at its lowest, -21.7 % change on previous year, in 2009.
Least developed countries ranks 29th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Least developed countries, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 150 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 186.67 % change on previous year | +24.4% |
| 1977 | 93.02 % change on previous year | -50.2% |
| 1978 | 183.13 % change on previous year | +96.9% |
| 1979 | 59.15 % change on previous year | -67.7% |
| 1980 | 53.21 % change on previous year | -10.0% |
| 1981 | 9.95 % change on previous year | -81.3% |
| 1982 | 18.89 % change on previous year | +89.9% |
| 1983 | 9.48 % change on previous year | -49.8% |
| 1984 | -1.95 % change on previous year | -120.6% |
| 1985 | 29.85 % change on previous year | -1629.8% |
| 1986 | 21.84 % change on previous year | -26.8% |
| 1987 | 12.26 % change on previous year | -43.8% |
| 1988 | -1.96 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 1989 | -19.36 % change on previous year | +887.2% |
| 1990 | 23.38 % change on previous year | -220.8% |
| 1991 | 3.02 % change on previous year | -87.1% |
| 1992 | 26.9 % change on previous year | +792.1% |
| 1993 | 38.93 % change on previous year | +44.7% |
| 1994 | 41.46 % change on previous year | +6.5% |
| 1995 | 55.57 % change on previous year | +34.0% |
| 1996 | 20.64 % change on previous year | -62.9% |
| 1997 | 19.34 % change on previous year | -6.3% |
| 1998 | 2.48 % change on previous year | -87.2% |
| 1999 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -37.2% |
| 2000 | 17.75 % change on previous year | +1039.3% |
| 2001 | 25.76 % change on previous year | +45.1% |
| 2002 | 46.53 % change on previous year | +80.6% |
| 2003 | 24.82 % change on previous year | -46.7% |
| 2004 | 19.76 % change on previous year | -20.4% |
| 2005 | 6.48 % change on previous year | -67.2% |
| 2006 | 25.72 % change on previous year | +296.7% |
| 2007 | 28.33 % change on previous year | +10.1% |
| 2008 | 13.27 % change on previous year | -53.1% |
| 2009 | -21.7 % change on previous year | -263.5% |
| 2010 | -7.46 % change on previous year | -65.6% |
| 2011 | 0.9093 % change on previous year | -112.2% |
| 2012 | -13.11 % change on previous year | -1541.6% |
| 2013 | -2.75 % change on previous year | -79.0% |
| 2014 | -4.92 % change on previous year | +78.6% |
| 2015 | -17.02 % change on previous year | +246.1% |
| 2016 | -7 % change on previous year | -58.9% |
| 2017 | 3.94 % change on previous year | -156.3% |
| 2018 | 1.93 % change on previous year | -50.9% |
| 2019 | -0.423 % change on previous year | -121.9% |
| 2020 | 0.8019 % change on previous year | -289.6% |
| 2021 | 8.75 % change on previous year | +990.8% |
| 2022 | -0.134 % change on previous year | -101.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 134.39 % change on previous year | 59.15 % change on previous year | 186.67 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1980s | 13.22 % change on previous year | -19.36 % change on previous year | 53.21 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 23.33 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | 55.57 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 18.67 % change on previous year | -21.7 % change on previous year | 46.53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -4.59 % change on previous year | -17.02 % change on previous year | 3.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.14 % change on previous year | -0.134 % change on previous year | 8.75 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Least developed countries
- 26 Honduras 48.38 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Brazil 47.99 % change on previous year compare
- 28 Guinea-Bissau 46.97 % change on previous year compare
- 29 Cameroon 43.19 % change on previous year compare
- 30 Lebanon 40.31 % change on previous year compare
- 31 India 33.93 % change on previous year compare
- 32 Mali 29.64 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 92.13 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 410.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.35 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.75 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 649.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.12 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.96 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.48 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 381.23 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.39 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Least developed countries?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Least developed countries was -0.134 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) recorded in Least developed countries?
- The highest recorded value was 186.67 % change on previous year in 1976.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) recorded in Least developed countries?
- The lowest recorded value was -21.7 % change on previous year in 2009.
- How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$)?
- Least developed countries ranks 29th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) rising or falling in Least developed countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 99.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.