Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Philippines
Philippines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 0.9455 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Philippines, 1982–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 0.9455 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 58.9% on the previous year and down 93.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Philippines peaked at 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1982.
That places Philippines 73rd out of 128 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Philippines, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1982 | 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.1006 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1985 | 0.1006 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1987 | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.1006 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1990 | 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1991 | 0.1006 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1992 | 0.2348 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1993 | 0.2348 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.2012 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1995 | 0.5366 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1996 | 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1997 | 0.5031 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1998 | 0.4695 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1999 | 0.8384 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.6% |
| 2000 | 0.6037 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 2001 | 0.2348 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 2002 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +357.1% |
| 2003 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.8% |
| 2004 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 2005 | 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2006 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.9% |
| 2007 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 2008 | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2009 | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2010 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.9% |
| 2011 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2012 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2013 | 13.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +994.7% |
| 2014 | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2015 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.0% |
| 2016 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.9% |
| 2017 | 0.6358 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 2018 | 0.127 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 2019 | 0.3916 current US$ per square kilometre | +208.5% |
| 2020 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.7% |
| 2021 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 2022 | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2023 | 0.9455 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0922 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1990s | 0.3387 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8384 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2348 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.127 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9455 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 70 Benin 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 71 Belarus 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 Costa Rica 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Mali 0.8688 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Eswatini 0.8367 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Ghana 0.8024 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Philippines
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 953,487 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 153.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -19,124 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.00 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Philippines?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Philippines was 0.9455 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0335 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982.
- How does Philippines rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Philippines ranks 73rd out of 128 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.