Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.79 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 19.1%
World rank
101st
of 153 countries
All-time high
3.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1988
All-time low
-0.8973 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1969
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Brazil is 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 19.1% on the previous year and up 209.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Brazil peaked at 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, -0.8973 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
That places Brazil 101st out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.9966 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.524 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.4% |
| 1963 | 0.9607 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1964 | 0.1998 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0658 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 1966 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1800.0% |
| 1967 | -0.7837 current US$ per square kilometre | -162.7% |
| 1968 | -0.7561 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1969 | -0.8973 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1970 | -0.6317 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1971 | -0.3601 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 1972 | -0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
| 1973 | -0.012 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0371 current US$ per square kilometre | -410.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0203 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0754 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.6% |
| 1977 | 0.1508 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1978 | 0.1651 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1979 | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1980 | 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1981 | 0.1484 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1982 | 0.2836 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.1% |
| 1983 | 0.3063 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1984 | 0.4535 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1985 | 0.4523 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1986 | 0.8794 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.4% |
| 1987 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1988 | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +247.0% |
| 1989 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 1990 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1991 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1992 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1993 | 0.8866 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 1994 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.5% |
| 1995 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1996 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1997 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 1998 | 0.4822 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 1999 | 0.4104 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2058 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.9% |
| 2001 | 0.6568 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.2% |
| 2002 | 0.3888 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2003 | 0.6473 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.5% |
| 2004 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.7% |
| 2005 | 0.1843 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.8% |
| 2006 | 0.9715 current US$ per square kilometre | +427.3% |
| 2007 | 0.7932 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.4% |
| 2009 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2010 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2011 | 0.9404 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 2012 | 0.6293 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.5767 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2014 | 0.554 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.911 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 2016 | 0.796 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2017 | 0.4427 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.4% |
| 2018 | 0.9971 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.2% |
| 2019 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2020 | 0.916 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2021 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.7% |
| 2022 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8973 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | -0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6317 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9575 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4104 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8922 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1843 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8176 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4427 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.916 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 98 Belarus 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 99 Peru 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Chad 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Dominican Republic 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Lesotho 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Kazakhstan 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Brazil was 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.8973 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Brazil ranks 101st out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 209.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.