Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 15.6% on the previous year and up 21.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 254.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0353 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 87th of 153 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.4764 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.4014 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1967 | 0.1544 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0529 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0794 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0485 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0353 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1972 | 0.3176 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1973 | 0.5029 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 1974 | 0.5558 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1975 | 0.4808 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1976 | 0.1456 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.7% |
| 1977 | 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1978 | 0.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 1979 | 0.3441 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.4% |
| 1980 | 0.2426 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1981 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +767.3% |
| 1982 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 1983 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1984 | 12.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +857.6% |
| 1985 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.6% |
| 1986 | 12.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.4% |
| 1987 | 13.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1988 | 24.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.1% |
| 1989 | 14.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 1990 | 63.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +338.7% |
| 1991 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.1% |
| 1992 | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1993 | 0.1764 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.8% |
| 1994 | 0.247 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1995 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +944.6% |
| 1996 | 0.8116 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.5646 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1998 | 0.6705 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1999 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 2000 | 0.4235 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.7% |
| 2001 | 0.7014 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.6% |
| 2002 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.4% |
| 2003 | 189.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +10984.8% |
| 2004 | 10.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.5% |
| 2005 | 0.4499 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.7% |
| 2006 | 0.5602 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 2007 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +226.0% |
| 2008 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.1% |
| 2009 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 2010 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2011 | 254.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +5921.8% |
| 2012 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.8% |
| 2013 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2015 | 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2016 | 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2017 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2018 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 2019 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2020 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2021 | 5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.6% |
| 2022 | 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 2023 | 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2329 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0529 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4764 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.2797 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0353 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5558 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2426 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1764 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 21.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4235 current US$ per square kilometre | 189.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 29.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 254.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 84 Madagascar 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Uruguay 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Colombia 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 88 Cambodia 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Estonia 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Congo 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 254.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0353 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 87th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.