Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was -0.8784 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) is -0.8784 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 106.1% on the previous year and down 6.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 21.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993 and was at its lowest, -2.79 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2006.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 44th out of 44 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.2% |
| 1972 | -0.1955 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0101 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.2% |
| 1974 | -0.1177 current US$ per square kilometre | -1262.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0278 current US$ per square kilometre | -123.7% |
| 1976 | 0.6607 current US$ per square kilometre | +2272.7% |
| 1977 | -0.0734 current US$ per square kilometre | -111.1% |
| 1978 | -0.0848 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1979 | 0.043 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.7% |
| 1980 | 0.3677 current US$ per square kilometre | +754.4% |
| 1981 | 0.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 1982 | 0.891 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.5% |
| 1983 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 1984 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1985 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1986 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.7% |
| 1987 | 8.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.3% |
| 1988 | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1989 | 9.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1990 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1991 | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1992 | 18.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +266.6% |
| 1993 | 21.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1994 | 13.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1995 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.1% |
| 1996 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1997 | -0.1297 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.9% |
| 1998 | 0.7866 current US$ per square kilometre | -706.3% |
| 1999 | -0.2151 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.4% |
| 2000 | -1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.1% |
| 2001 | -1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2002 | -1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.7% |
| 2003 | -1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2004 | -2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 2005 | -1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 2006 | -2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.0% |
| 2007 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -163.6% |
| 2008 | -1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -169.4% |
| 2009 | -2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.8% |
| 2010 | -2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2011 | -2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2012 | -0.8225 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.1% |
| 2013 | 0.5591 current US$ per square kilometre | -168.0% |
| 2014 | 0.3586 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 2015 | -0.0095 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.6% |
| 2016 | -0.2798 current US$ per square kilometre | +2860.1% |
| 2017 | 0.133 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.5% |
| 2018 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +720.9% |
| 2019 | 0.7059 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 2020 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.1% |
| 2021 | -0.4263 current US$ per square kilometre | -130.5% |
| 2022 | -0.8784 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.4736 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1955 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2151 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.2889 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0313 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8784 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 41 Guinea-Bissau 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Seychelles 21.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Cameroon 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Somalia 20.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Benin 18.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Pakistan 17.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Republic of Korea 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was -0.8784 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 21.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.