Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Lower middle income stood at 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 14.2% on the previous year and up 61.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Lower middle income peaked at 55.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 1994 and was at its lowest, -0.481 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1974.
Lower middle income ranks 16th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1712 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.2198 current US$ per square kilometre | -228.4% |
| 1963 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -701.5% |
| 1964 | 0.9422 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1965 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.9% |
| 1966 | 0.7986 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1967 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +397.6% |
| 1968 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1969 | 0.8593 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.0% |
| 1970 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.3% |
| 1971 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1972 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1973 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1974 | -0.481 current US$ per square kilometre | -121.5% |
| 1975 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -543.4% |
| 1976 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1977 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1978 | 0.2535 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.0% |
| 1979 | -0.254 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.2% |
| 1980 | -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1981 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -675.8% |
| 1982 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.1% |
| 1983 | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.5% |
| 1984 | 9.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.7% |
| 1985 | 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1986 | 23.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.8% |
| 1987 | 35.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1988 | 40.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1989 | 36.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1990 | 37.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1991 | 35.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1992 | 48.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 1993 | 37.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 1994 | 55.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 1995 | 14.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.4% |
| 1996 | 14.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1997 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.9% |
| 1998 | 10.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 1999 | 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2000 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2001 | 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.6% |
| 2002 | 11.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +235.5% |
| 2003 | 9.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 2004 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2005 | 42.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +629.2% |
| 2006 | 49.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2007 | 11.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.1% |
| 2008 | 16 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2009 | 15.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2011 | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2012 | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 2013 | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 2014 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2015 | 10.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2016 | 9.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2017 | 14.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.1% |
| 2018 | 14.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 15.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2020 | 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2021 | 16.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2022 | 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2023 | 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2198 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.481 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 27.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 13 Mauritius 275.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Cape Verde 245.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Syria 205.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Tunisia 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Montenegro 177.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Gambia 145.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Senegal 138.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Lower middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 83.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 179.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.02 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 654.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.26 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.64 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 725.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 268.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.40 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Lower middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Lower middle income was 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 55.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 1994.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.481 current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Lower middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Lower middle income ranks 16th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 61.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.