Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
3.95 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 71.4%
Rank
35th
of 44 groups
All-time high
22.76 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
-0.2785 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1972
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Upper middle income stood at 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 71.4% on the previous year and up 342.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, -0.2785 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1972.
That places Upper middle income 35th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.47 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.3014 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 1963 | 0.4613 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.0% |
| 1964 | 0.3309 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1965 | -0.217 current US$ per square kilometre | -165.6% |
| 1966 | -0.2118 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1967 | 0.5127 current US$ per square kilometre | -342.1% |
| 1968 | 0.8893 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 1969 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1970 | 0.3734 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 1971 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +423.3% |
| 1972 | -0.2785 current US$ per square kilometre | -114.3% |
| 1973 | 0.4251 current US$ per square kilometre | -252.6% |
| 1974 | 0.035 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.8% |
| 1975 | -0.0569 current US$ per square kilometre | -262.9% |
| 1976 | 0.7335 current US$ per square kilometre | -1388.2% |
| 1977 | 0.1039 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.8% |
| 1978 | 0.1881 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.0% |
| 1979 | 0.213 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1980 | 0.4825 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.5% |
| 1981 | 0.3327 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 1982 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +274.2% |
| 1983 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1984 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1985 | 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1986 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.1% |
| 1987 | 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1988 | 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1989 | 12.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.6% |
| 1990 | 9.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1991 | 18.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.6% |
| 1992 | 15.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1993 | 11.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1994 | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1995 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1996 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1997 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.1% |
| 1998 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1999 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.7% |
| 2000 | 0.4261 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.3% |
| 2001 | 0.5541 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2002 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.2% |
| 2003 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2004 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.6% |
| 2005 | 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +857.2% |
| 2006 | 15.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 2007 | 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2008 | 21.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 2009 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.0% |
| 2010 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.9% |
| 2011 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2012 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 2013 | 0.8912 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2014 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2015 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.5% |
| 2016 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 2017 | 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.9% |
| 2018 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.4% |
| 2019 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2020 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.0% |
| 2021 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2022 | 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 2023 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.217 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.369 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2785 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3327 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4261 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8912 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 32 Turkey 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 33.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Uganda 33.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Kenya 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Sierra Leone 28.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Togo 25.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2785 current US$ per square kilometre in 1972.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 35th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 342.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.