Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 1.26 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 1.26 billion current US$.
That represents a change of up 48.9% on the previous year and up 1,120.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 5.37 billion current US$ in 1999 and was at its lowest, -1.19 billion current US$, in 2018.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 186.75 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 214.20 million current US$ | +14.7% |
| 1972 | 289.62 million current US$ | +35.2% |
| 1973 | 408.29 million current US$ | +41.0% |
| 1974 | 470.05 million current US$ | +15.1% |
| 1975 | 420.93 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 1976 | 427.20 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 1977 | 298.67 million current US$ | -30.1% |
| 1978 | 588.62 million current US$ | +97.1% |
| 1979 | 805.67 million current US$ | +36.9% |
| 1980 | 871.89 million current US$ | +8.2% |
| 1981 | 962.00 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 1982 | 1.17 billion current US$ | +21.8% |
| 1983 | 1.20 billion current US$ | +2.8% |
| 1984 | 1.31 billion current US$ | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 1.36 billion current US$ | +3.8% |
| 1986 | 1.69 billion current US$ | +24.2% |
| 1987 | 2.46 billion current US$ | +45.7% |
| 1988 | 2.94 billion current US$ | +19.4% |
| 1989 | 3.13 billion current US$ | +6.4% |
| 1990 | 3.20 billion current US$ | +2.4% |
| 1991 | 2.97 billion current US$ | -7.5% |
| 1992 | 4.59 billion current US$ | +54.9% |
| 1993 | 3.96 billion current US$ | -13.9% |
| 1994 | 3.88 billion current US$ | -1.9% |
| 1995 | 4.21 billion current US$ | +8.6% |
| 1996 | 3.01 billion current US$ | -28.6% |
| 1997 | 2.22 billion current US$ | -26.2% |
| 1998 | 3.83 billion current US$ | +72.2% |
| 1999 | 5.37 billion current US$ | +40.4% |
| 2000 | 4.17 billion current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2001 | 2.98 billion current US$ | -28.4% |
| 2002 | 2.75 billion current US$ | -7.8% |
| 2003 | 2.37 billion current US$ | -13.8% |
| 2004 | 1.97 billion current US$ | -16.8% |
| 2005 | 3.21 billion current US$ | +62.6% |
| 2006 | 1.39 billion current US$ | -56.7% |
| 2007 | 1.18 billion current US$ | -15.2% |
| 2008 | -1.31 million current US$ | -100.1% |
| 2009 | 1.22 billion current US$ | -92902.4% |
| 2010 | 961.28 million current US$ | -20.9% |
| 2011 | -207.37 million current US$ | -121.6% |
| 2012 | -123.11 million current US$ | -40.6% |
| 2013 | 1.99 billion current US$ | -1716.1% |
| 2014 | 148.62 million current US$ | -92.5% |
| 2015 | 39.41 million current US$ | -73.5% |
| 2016 | -111.59 million current US$ | -383.2% |
| 2017 | 116.56 million current US$ | -204.5% |
| 2018 | -1.19 billion current US$ | -1118.4% |
| 2019 | -364.10 million current US$ | -69.3% |
| 2020 | 1.65 billion current US$ | -553.4% |
| 2021 | 843.98 million current US$ | -48.9% |
| 2022 | 1.26 billion current US$ | +48.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 411.00 million current US$ | 186.75 million current US$ | 805.67 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.71 billion current US$ | 871.89 million current US$ | 3.13 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.72 billion current US$ | 2.22 billion current US$ | 5.37 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.12 billion current US$ | -1.31 million current US$ | 4.17 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 126.22 million current US$ | -1.19 billion current US$ | 1.99 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.25 billion current US$ | 843.98 million current US$ | 1.65 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 21 Madagascar 100.30 million current US$ compare
- 22 Palestine, State of 92.87 million current US$ compare
- 23 Jordan 91.09 million current US$ compare
- 24 Senegal 85.26 million current US$ compare
- 25 Ethiopia 84.05 million current US$ compare
- 26 Sri Lanka 76.61 million current US$ compare
- 27 Syrian Arab Republic 67.51 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 1.26 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 5.37 billion current US$ in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.19 billion current US$ in 2018.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,120.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.