Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Lithuania

Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 3.16 million current US$ in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
3.16 million current US$
Change on year
up 25.9%
World rank
105th
of 173 countries
All-time high
3.16 million current US$
in 2004
All-time low
20,000 current US$
in 1992
Years of data
13
1992–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Lithuania, 1992–2004

01.0M2.0M3.0M1992199820041992: 20.0k current US$1993: 80.0k current US$1994: 120.0k current US$1995: 160.0k current US$1996: 290.0k current US$1997: 270.0k current US$1998: 1.2M current US$1999: 1.7M current US$2000: 2.0M current US$2001: 1.8M current US$2002: 1.5M current US$2003: 2.5M current US$2004: 3.2M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Lithuania is 3.16 million current US$, measured in 2004. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.

That represents a change of up 25.9% on the previous year and up 2,533.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Lithuania peaked at 3.16 million current US$ in 2004 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 1992.

Lithuania ranks 105th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Lithuania, 1992 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1992 20,000 current US$
1993 80,000 current US$ +300.0%
1994 120,000 current US$ +50.0%
1995 160,000 current US$ +33.3%
1996 290,000 current US$ +81.2%
1997 270,000 current US$ -6.9%
1998 1.21 million current US$ +348.1%
1999 1.69 million current US$ +39.7%
2000 2.01 million current US$ +18.9%
2001 1.79 million current US$ -10.9%
2002 1.48 million current US$ -17.3%
2003 2.51 million current US$ +69.6%
2004 3.16 million current US$ +25.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 480,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 1.69 million current US$ 8
2000s 2.19 million current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 3.16 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 102 Saint Lucia 4.05 million current US$ compare
  2. 103 Micronesia, Federated States of 3.98 million current US$ compare
  3. 104 Cape Verde 3.30 million current US$ compare
  4. 106 Suriname 3.02 million current US$ compare
  5. 107 Congo 3.01 million current US$ compare
  6. 108 Chile 2.79 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Lithuania?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Lithuania was 3.16 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 3.16 million current US$ in 2004.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1992.
How does Lithuania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Lithuania ranks 105th out of 173 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 2,533.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/lithuania/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.