Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Belarus

Belarus: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 739,908 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
739,908 current US$
Change on year
up 429.9%
World rank
103rd
of 155 countries
All-time high
1.59 million current US$
in 2021
All-time low
30,000 current US$
in 2005
Years of data
19
2005–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Belarus, 2005–2023

0500.0k1.0M1.5M2005201420232005: 30.0k current US$2006: 30.0k current US$2007: 50.0k current US$2008: 440.0k current US$2009: 50.0k current US$2010: 90.0k current US$2011: 250.0k current US$2012: 260.0k current US$2013: 187.5k current US$2014: 637.5k current US$2015: 367.8k current US$2016: 236.2k current US$2017: 356.4k current US$2018: 136.3k current US$2019: 164.3k current US$2020: 1.1M current US$2021: 1.6M current US$2022: 139.6k current US$2023: 739.9k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Belarus stood at 739,908 current US$.

The figure is up 429.9% on the previous year and up 294.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Belarus peaked at 1.59 million current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 30,000 current US$, in 2005.

Belarus ranks 103rd of 155 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled in Belarus, 2005 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
2005 30,000 current US$
2006 30,000 current US$ +0.0%
2007 50,000 current US$ +66.7%
2008 440,000 current US$ +780.0%
2009 50,000 current US$ -88.6%
2010 90,000 current US$ +80.0%
2011 250,000 current US$ +177.8%
2012 260,000 current US$ +4.0%
2013 187,522 current US$ -27.9%
2014 637,508 current US$ +240.0%
2015 367,839 current US$ -42.3%
2016 236,225 current US$ -35.8%
2017 356,433 current US$ +50.9%
2018 136,284 current US$ -61.8%
2019 164,306 current US$ +20.6%
2020 1.07 million current US$ +548.8%
2021 1.59 million current US$ +49.0%
2022 139,624 current US$ -91.2%
2023 739,908 current US$ +429.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 120,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ 440,000 current US$ 5
2010s 268,612 current US$ 90,000 current US$ 637,508 current US$ 10
2020s 883,576 current US$ 139,624 current US$ 1.59 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 100 Cape Verde 762,628 current US$ compare
  2. 101 Panama 762,176 current US$ compare
  3. 102 Benin 749,266 current US$ compare
  4. 104 Guyana 731,694 current US$ compare
  5. 105 Turkmenistan 715,010 current US$ compare
  6. 106 Marshall Islands 711,854 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 201 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Belarus?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Belarus was 739,908 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 1.59 million current US$ in 2021.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 30,000 current US$ in 2005.
How does Belarus rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Belarus ranks 103rd out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 294.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.