Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 132.63 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), 1988–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) is 132.63 million current US$, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 12.1% on the previous year and up 136.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) peaked at 181.66 million current US$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 50,000 current US$, in 1990.
That places Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) 35th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 60,000 current US$ | — |
| 1989 | 80,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1990 | 50,000 current US$ | -37.5% |
| 1991 | 540,000 current US$ | +980.0% |
| 1992 | 830,000 current US$ | +53.7% |
| 1993 | 3.04 million current US$ | +266.3% |
| 1994 | 4.54 million current US$ | +49.3% |
| 1995 | 4.31 million current US$ | -5.1% |
| 1996 | 3.82 million current US$ | -11.4% |
| 1997 | 2.69 million current US$ | -29.6% |
| 1998 | 2.62 million current US$ | -2.6% |
| 1999 | 8.72 million current US$ | +232.8% |
| 2000 | 12.90 million current US$ | +47.9% |
| 2001 | 4.71 million current US$ | -63.5% |
| 2002 | 9.66 million current US$ | +105.1% |
| 2003 | 45.24 million current US$ | +368.3% |
| 2004 | 83.37 million current US$ | +84.3% |
| 2005 | 181.66 million current US$ | +117.9% |
| 2006 | 79.94 million current US$ | -56.0% |
| 2007 | 80.57 million current US$ | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 44.40 million current US$ | -44.9% |
| 2009 | 27.63 million current US$ | -37.8% |
| 2010 | 41.69 million current US$ | +50.9% |
| 2011 | 57.81 million current US$ | +38.7% |
| 2012 | 56.09 million current US$ | -3.0% |
| 2013 | 54.04 million current US$ | -3.7% |
| 2014 | 85.24 million current US$ | +57.7% |
| 2015 | 77.40 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 2016 | 74.46 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 2017 | 80.00 million current US$ | +7.4% |
| 2018 | 162.30 million current US$ | +102.9% |
| 2019 | 151.93 million current US$ | -6.4% |
| 2020 | 75.96 million current US$ | -50.0% |
| 2021 | 150.82 million current US$ | +98.6% |
| 2022 | 132.63 million current US$ | -12.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | +980.0% | 50,000 current US$ | 540,000 current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 70,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 2 |
| 1990s | 3.12 million current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 8.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 57.01 million current US$ | 4.71 million current US$ | 181.66 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 84.10 million current US$ | 41.69 million current US$ | 162.30 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 119.80 million current US$ | 75.96 million current US$ | 150.82 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- 32 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 14.33 million current US$ compare
- 33 Peru 14.02 million current US$ compare
- 34 Türkiye 13.62 million current US$ compare
- 35 Colombia 13.59 million current US$ compare
- 36 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 12.53 million current US$ compare
- 37 Nepal 12.41 million current US$ compare
- 38 Senegal 12.31 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 56.11 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 48.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 308.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.21 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 181.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.89 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 305.30 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.19 billion current US$ (2022)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) was 132.63 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The highest recorded value was 181.66 million current US$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The lowest recorded value was 50,000 current US$ in 1990.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 35th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 136.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.