Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Euro area
Euro area: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 0.0007 current US$ per person in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Euro area, 1991–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Euro area is 0.0007 current US$ per person, measured in 2004.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 59.2% on the previous year and up 16.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Euro area peaked at 0.0009 current US$ per person in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 current US$ per person, in 1991.
That places Euro area 44th out of 46 groups with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Euro area, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0.0001 current US$ per person | — |
| 1992 | 0.0002 current US$ per person | +74.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 current US$ per person | +56.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0006 current US$ per person | +81.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0009 current US$ per person | +44.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0009 current US$ per person | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0007 current US$ per person | -26.8% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 current US$ per person | -72.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0002 current US$ per person | -16.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 current US$ per person | +79.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 current US$ per person | -44.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0009 current US$ per person | +477.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0004 current US$ per person | -48.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0007 current US$ per person | +59.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Euro area changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +477.5% | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 0.0009 current US$ per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 current US$ per person | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 0.0009 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 2000s | 0.0005 current US$ per person | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 0.0009 current US$ per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Euro area
- 41 Lebanon 0.8059 current US$ per person compare
- 42 Sri Lanka 0.8003 current US$ per person compare
- 43 Ghana 0.7968 current US$ per person compare
- 44 Vietnam 0.7889 current US$ per person compare
- 45 Costa Rica 0.7455 current US$ per person compare
- 46 Saint Lucia 0.7285 current US$ per person compare
- 47 Lesotho 0.6976 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Euro area
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 9.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 820,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.18 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 713.83 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 31.86 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 17.56 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 110,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 27.66 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Euro area?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Euro area was 0.0007 current US$ per person in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Euro area?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0009 current US$ per person in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Euro area?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 current US$ per person in 1991.
- How does Euro area rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Euro area ranks 44th out of 46 groups with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Euro area?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Euro area data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.