Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in China, 1988–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in China is -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 18.4% on the previous year and up 63.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in China peaked at 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, -1.53 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2013.
That places China 150th out of 155 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0341 current US$ per square kilometre | +966.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0746 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1994 | 0.3078 current US$ per square kilometre | +312.9% |
| 1995 | 0.6263 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.5% |
| 1996 | 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +592.5% |
| 1997 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.6% |
| 1998 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1999 | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2000 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 2001 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2002 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.8% |
| 2003 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 2004 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 2005 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 2006 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 2007 | 0.6721 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2008 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0671 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.0% |
| 2010 | 0.3291 current US$ per square kilometre | +390.5% |
| 2011 | -0.1086 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.0% |
| 2012 | -0.1715 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.8% |
| 2013 | -1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +795.1% |
| 2014 | -0.7196 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 2015 | -0.7829 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2016 | -0.5613 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2017 | -0.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 2018 | -0.7106 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2019 | -0.4633 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.8% |
| 2020 | -0.0666 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.6% |
| 2021 | -0.5316 current US$ per square kilometre | +698.8% |
| 2022 | -0.4791 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2023 | -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0027 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0671 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.5544 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3291 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.4112 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0666 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 147 Saudi Arabia 0.0744 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 148 Oman 0.0323 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 149 Eritrea 0.0204 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 151 Hungary -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Romania -8.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 153 Albania -18.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in China was -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- China ranks 150th out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 63.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.