Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Hungary
Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Hungary, 1990–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Hungary is -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2004.
The figure is down 42.9% on the previous year and down 501.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Hungary peaked at 131.51 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, -25.39 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Hungary ranks 151st of 155 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Hungary, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.2225 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.3338 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1992 | 0.6676 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1993 | 0.779 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1994 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1995 | 0.5564 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1996 | 0.779 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1997 | 131.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +16782.6% |
| 1998 | -25.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.3% |
| 1999 | 0.4454 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.8% |
| 2000 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.6% |
| 2001 | 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +191.7% |
| 2002 | -3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -185.7% |
| 2003 | -3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2004 | -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 131.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 148 Oman 0.0323 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 149 Eritrea 0.0204 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 150 China -0.5674 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Romania -8.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 153 Albania -18.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Croatia -37.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Hungary
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.90 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 450,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 760,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 237.81 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 160,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.92 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 12.78 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 730,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 30,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.72 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Hungary?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Hungary was -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 131.51 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was -25.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Hungary rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Hungary ranks 151st out of 155 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 501.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.