Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1988–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in 2022. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.
The figure is up 10.2% on the previous year and up 58.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0532 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1988.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 10th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.0532 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0911 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1991 | 0.7555 current US$ per square kilometre | +729.1% |
| 1992 | 0.8074 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1993 | 0.7258 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1995 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1996 | 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +188.9% |
| 1997 | 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1998 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1999 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2000 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2001 | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.2% |
| 2002 | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2003 | 6.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2004 | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2005 | 6.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2006 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2007 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.4% |
| 2008 | 11.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2009 | 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2010 | 16.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 2011 | 21.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 2012 | 25.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2013 | 27.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2014 | 26.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2015 | 32.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2016 | 30.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 31.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2018 | 31.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2019 | 31.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 37.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2021 | 36.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2022 | 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0617 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0532 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0911 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 27.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 37.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 7 Grenada 1,368 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Palau 1,108 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Rwanda 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 982.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Palestine, State of 795.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Comoros 682.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Cambodia 642.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0532 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 10th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.