Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
13.58 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 6.9%
Rank
30th
of 46 groups
All-time high
16.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low income is 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 6.9% on the previous year and down 15.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low income peaked at 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Low income ranks 30th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | +4540.0% |
| 1992 | 0.2249 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1993 | 0.2126 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1994 | 0.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.1% |
| 1995 | 0.6187 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1996 | 0.2367 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1997 | 0.1296 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0855 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1999 | 0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 2000 | 0.059 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 2002 | 0.524 current US$ per square kilometre | +625.3% |
| 2003 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +253.1% |
| 2004 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2005 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 2006 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 2007 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2008 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.5% |
| 2009 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.4% |
| 2010 | 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +240.9% |
| 2011 | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.1% |
| 2012 | 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 2013 | 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.8% |
| 2014 | 13.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2015 | 12.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2016 | 15.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 2017 | 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2018 | 14 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2019 | 14.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2020 | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 2021 | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 2022 | 14.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2023 | 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2229 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6187 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.059 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 27 Saint Lucia 214.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Antigua and Barbuda 210.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Cape Verde 189.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Mauritius 163.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Guatemala 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Barbados 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Burundi 139.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low income was 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Low income ranks 30th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.