Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan recorded 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 21.4% on the previous year and down 25.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan peaked at 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 34th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0474 current US$ per square kilometre | +650.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0964 current US$ per square kilometre | +320.7% |
| 1992 | 0.1913 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.4% |
| 1993 | 0.2878 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.4% |
| 1994 | 0.419 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1995 | 0.3897 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1996 | 0.3692 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1997 | 0.3447 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.6222 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.5% |
| 1999 | 0.7573 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 2000 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 2001 | 0.6925 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2002 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 2003 | 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +382.2% |
| 2004 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 2005 | 15.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.5% |
| 2006 | 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.3% |
| 2007 | 7 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 2009 | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2010 | 12.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.1% |
| 2011 | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 2012 | 11.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 2013 | 17.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 2014 | 13.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2015 | 11.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2016 | 10.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2018 | 16.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.2% |
| 2019 | 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 2020 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.3% |
| 2021 | 16.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.0% |
| 2022 | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2023 | 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0474 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3501 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7573 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6925 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- 31 Guatemala 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Barbados 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Burundi 139.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Micronesia, Federated States of 135.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Solomon Islands 127.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Bahrain 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 76.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 92.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 582.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.51 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 387.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.31 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.27 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 708.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.83 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan was 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 34th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.