Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Russian Federation, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Russian Federation stood at 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 53.8% on the previous year and up 384.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Russian Federation peaked at 0.1294 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Russian Federation 146th out of 155 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 1994 | 0.0201 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0666 current US$ per square kilometre | +230.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.5% |
| 1997 | 0.033 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1999 | 0.1269 current US$ per square kilometre | +395.0% |
| 2000 | 0.1294 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0849 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0678 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0635 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2004 | 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0398 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1269 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0886 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0635 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1294 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 143 Estonia 0.2359 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 144 Brazil 0.2081 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 145 Namibia 0.1681 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 147 Saudi Arabia 0.0744 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 148 Oman 0.0323 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 149 Eritrea 0.0204 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 22.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 90,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.20 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 160.07 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 12.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 98.31 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.89 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.82 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Russian Federation?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Russian Federation was 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1294 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Russian Federation rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Russian Federation ranks 146th out of 155 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 384.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.