Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square was 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in South Asia stood at 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 175.9% on the previous year and up 207.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in South Asia peaked at 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
South Asia ranks 2nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.1192 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.1818 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0805 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1991 | 0.4976 current US$ per square kilometre | +778.9% |
| 1992 | 0.9237 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.6% |
| 1993 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.7% |
| 1994 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1995 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1996 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1997 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1998 | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +720.8% |
| 1999 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2000 | 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.6% |
| 2001 | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 2002 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2003 | 9 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.9% |
| 2004 | 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2005 | 21.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.5% |
| 2006 | 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 2007 | 15.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2008 | 11.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2009 | 14.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2010 | 36 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.7% |
| 2011 | 43.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2012 | 35.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2013 | 32.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2014 | 38.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2015 | 29.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 2016 | 22.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 2017 | 19.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2018 | 31.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.4% |
| 2019 | 45.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 2020 | 39.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2021 | 76.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.4% |
| 2022 | 35.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.2% |
| 2023 | 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.9% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in South Asia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | +778.9% | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4976 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1998 | +720.8% | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0381 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1818 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 62.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 1 Tuvalu 55,055 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Nauru 12,590 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Marshall Islands 3,955 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 El Salvador 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Kiribati 2,463 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in South Asia was 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 99.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- South Asia ranks 2nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 207.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.