Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Africa Western and Central
Africa Western and Central: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 7.01 % change on previous year in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Africa Western and Central, 1971–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Africa Western and Central is 7.01 % change on previous year, measured in 2019.
The figure is up 540.4% on the previous year and up 190.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Africa Western and Central peaked at 123.83 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -44.5 % change on previous year, in 2008.
Africa Western and Central ranks 22nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Africa Western and Central, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 41.18 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 119.83 % change on previous year | +191.0% |
| 1973 | -3.53 % change on previous year | -102.9% |
| 1974 | -7.86 % change on previous year | +122.7% |
| 1975 | 20.66 % change on previous year | -362.9% |
| 1976 | 70.51 % change on previous year | +241.2% |
| 1977 | 69.48 % change on previous year | -1.5% |
| 1978 | 35.49 % change on previous year | -48.9% |
| 1979 | 32.5 % change on previous year | -8.4% |
| 1980 | 9.88 % change on previous year | -69.6% |
| 1981 | -23.25 % change on previous year | -335.4% |
| 1982 | 0.195 % change on previous year | -100.8% |
| 1983 | 6.27 % change on previous year | +3115.2% |
| 1984 | -0.6803 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 1985 | -13.79 % change on previous year | +1927.2% |
| 1986 | 70.59 % change on previous year | -611.8% |
| 1987 | 26.65 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 1988 | 19.93 % change on previous year | -25.2% |
| 1989 | -5.38 % change on previous year | -127.0% |
| 1990 | 29.72 % change on previous year | -652.6% |
| 1991 | -29.78 % change on previous year | -200.2% |
| 1992 | 15.99 % change on previous year | -153.7% |
| 1993 | -19.89 % change on previous year | -224.4% |
| 1994 | -1.55 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1995 | 28.62 % change on previous year | -1951.0% |
| 1996 | 6.74 % change on previous year | -76.4% |
| 1997 | -10.16 % change on previous year | -250.6% |
| 1998 | 14.04 % change on previous year | -238.2% |
| 1999 | -38.97 % change on previous year | -377.6% |
| 2000 | 21.55 % change on previous year | -155.3% |
| 2001 | 123.83 % change on previous year | +474.6% |
| 2002 | -20.82 % change on previous year | -116.8% |
| 2003 | 9.7 % change on previous year | -146.6% |
| 2004 | 34.67 % change on previous year | +257.4% |
| 2005 | 38.51 % change on previous year | +11.1% |
| 2006 | 7.08 % change on previous year | -81.6% |
| 2007 | 40.91 % change on previous year | +478.2% |
| 2008 | -44.5 % change on previous year | -208.8% |
| 2009 | -7.72 % change on previous year | -82.6% |
| 2010 | -14.99 % change on previous year | +94.1% |
| 2011 | -18.59 % change on previous year | +24.0% |
| 2012 | -34.15 % change on previous year | +83.7% |
| 2013 | -2.26 % change on previous year | -93.4% |
| 2014 | -9.84 % change on previous year | +336.5% |
| 2015 | -31.84 % change on previous year | +223.4% |
| 2016 | 9.29 % change on previous year | -129.2% |
| 2017 | 5.46 % change on previous year | -41.2% |
| 2018 | 1.09 % change on previous year | -80.0% |
| 2019 | 7.01 % change on previous year | +540.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 42.03 % change on previous year | -7.86 % change on previous year | 119.83 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 9.04 % change on previous year | -23.25 % change on previous year | 70.59 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.5231 % change on previous year | -38.97 % change on previous year | 29.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.32 % change on previous year | -44.5 % change on previous year | 123.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -8.88 % change on previous year | -34.15 % change on previous year | 9.29 % change on previous year | 10 |
Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central
- 20 Indonesia 97.71 % change on previous year compare
- 21 Ukraine 90.51 % change on previous year compare
- 22 Panama 78.18 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Viet Nam 72.99 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Hungary 58.93 % change on previous year compare
- 25 Mexico 58.15 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 16.65 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 125.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.97 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.72 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 216.58 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.07 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.82 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 592.48 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 88.12 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 363.44 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Africa Western and Central?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Africa Western and Central was 7.01 % change on previous year in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The highest recorded value was 123.83 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The lowest recorded value was -44.5 % change on previous year in 2008.
- How does Africa Western and Central rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Africa Western and Central ranks 22nd out of 46 groups with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
- Over the last ten years it is up 190.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.