Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 22.96 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 22.96 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 38.2% on the previous year and up 100.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 422.16 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 1971.
That places Congo, Democratic Republic of the 14th out of 163 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 500,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 20,000 current US$ | -96.0% |
| 1972 | 110,000 current US$ | +450.0% |
| 1973 | 830,000 current US$ | +654.5% |
| 1974 | 1.00 million current US$ | +20.5% |
| 1975 | 420,000 current US$ | -58.0% |
| 1976 | 460,000 current US$ | +9.5% |
| 1977 | 1.27 million current US$ | +176.1% |
| 1978 | 1.64 million current US$ | +29.1% |
| 1979 | 3.10 million current US$ | +89.0% |
| 1980 | 1.90 million current US$ | -38.7% |
| 1981 | 2.33 million current US$ | +22.6% |
| 1982 | 2.09 million current US$ | -10.3% |
| 1983 | 1.89 million current US$ | -9.6% |
| 1984 | 1.43 million current US$ | -24.3% |
| 1985 | 1.69 million current US$ | +18.2% |
| 1986 | 1.19 million current US$ | -29.6% |
| 1987 | 1.37 million current US$ | +15.1% |
| 1988 | 3.35 million current US$ | +144.5% |
| 1989 | 3.19 million current US$ | -4.8% |
| 1990 | 3.89 million current US$ | +21.9% |
| 1991 | 5.74 million current US$ | +47.6% |
| 1992 | 7.14 million current US$ | +24.4% |
| 1993 | 6.49 million current US$ | -9.1% |
| 1994 | 5.17 million current US$ | -20.3% |
| 1995 | 7.83 million current US$ | +51.5% |
| 1996 | 4.70 million current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1997 | 7.31 million current US$ | +55.5% |
| 1998 | 8.10 million current US$ | +10.8% |
| 1999 | 2.46 million current US$ | -69.6% |
| 2000 | 4.67 million current US$ | +89.8% |
| 2001 | 12.00 million current US$ | +157.0% |
| 2002 | 135.03 million current US$ | +1025.2% |
| 2003 | 220.55 million current US$ | +63.3% |
| 2004 | 58.75 million current US$ | -73.4% |
| 2005 | 46.23 million current US$ | -21.3% |
| 2006 | 29.88 million current US$ | -35.4% |
| 2007 | 50.74 million current US$ | +69.8% |
| 2008 | 47.79 million current US$ | -5.8% |
| 2009 | 43.36 million current US$ | -9.3% |
| 2010 | 422.16 million current US$ | +873.6% |
| 2011 | 18.28 million current US$ | -95.7% |
| 2012 | 22.16 million current US$ | +21.2% |
| 2013 | 11.48 million current US$ | -48.2% |
| 2014 | 9.94 million current US$ | -13.4% |
| 2015 | 7.09 million current US$ | -28.7% |
| 2016 | 13.29 million current US$ | +87.5% |
| 2017 | 22.28 million current US$ | +67.7% |
| 2018 | 24.43 million current US$ | +9.6% |
| 2019 | 17.27 million current US$ | -29.3% |
| 2020 | 16.35 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2021 | 25.45 million current US$ | +55.6% |
| 2022 | 16.61 million current US$ | -34.7% |
| 2023 | 22.96 million current US$ | +38.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 935,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 3.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.04 million current US$ | 1.19 million current US$ | 3.35 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.88 million current US$ | 2.46 million current US$ | 8.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 64.90 million current US$ | 4.67 million current US$ | 220.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 56.84 million current US$ | 7.09 million current US$ | 422.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.34 million current US$ | 16.35 million current US$ | 25.45 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 11 Burkina Faso 29.69 million current US$ compare
- 12 Pakistan 27.19 million current US$ compare
- 13 Palestine, State of 23.39 million current US$ compare
- 15 Tunisia 22.73 million current US$ compare
- 16 Bangladesh 22.59 million current US$ compare
- 17 Niger 18.87 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 22.96 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 422.16 million current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1971.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 14th out of 163 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.