Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Türkiye
Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5.58 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 399.3%
World rank
72nd
of 160 countries
All-time high
138.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
-6.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Türkiye, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Türkiye stood at 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 399.3% on the previous year and up 632.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Türkiye peaked at 138.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, -6.83 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1995.
Türkiye ranks 72nd of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.7926 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.7926 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | -116.4% |
| 1964 | 0.3898 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1965 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +650.0% |
| 1967 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1968 | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.0% |
| 1969 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.0% |
| 1970 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 1971 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1972 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1973 | 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +706.1% |
| 1974 | -0.4937 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.1% |
| 1975 | 0.7926 current US$ per square kilometre | -260.5% |
| 1976 | 0.3118 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 1977 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +633.3% |
| 1978 | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +261.9% |
| 1979 | 5.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 1980 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1981 | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1982 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.5% |
| 1983 | 0.3768 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.2% |
| 1984 | -0.4808 current US$ per square kilometre | -227.6% |
| 1985 | -2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +508.1% |
| 1986 | -2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1987 | -0.5977 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 1988 | 0.7016 current US$ per square kilometre | -217.4% |
| 1989 | 0.2729 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 1990 | 0.5717 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.5% |
| 1991 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1992 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.9% |
| 1993 | -0.6107 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.5% |
| 1994 | -1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.9% |
| 1995 | -6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +349.6% |
| 1996 | -1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.6% |
| 1997 | -0.8056 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.4% |
| 1998 | 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -554.8% |
| 1999 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2000 | 0.7406 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.5% |
| 2001 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +326.3% |
| 2002 | 0.3508 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.9% |
| 2003 | 6.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +1755.6% |
| 2004 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 2005 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.3% |
| 2006 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2007 | -1 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.4% |
| 2008 | -0.7796 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2009 | -0.3378 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2010 | 0.4158 current US$ per square kilometre | -223.1% |
| 2011 | -0.1169 current US$ per square kilometre | -128.1% |
| 2012 | 0.3774 current US$ per square kilometre | -422.7% |
| 2013 | 0.7617 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.8% |
| 2014 | 0.8452 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2015 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.9% |
| 2016 | 138.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +6651.1% |
| 2017 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.8% |
| 2018 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2019 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 2020 | 0.9534 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.0% |
| 2021 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 2022 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2023 | 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +399.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7926 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4937 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3573 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2755 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -1 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1169 current US$ per square kilometre | 138.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9534 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 69 Samoa 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 70 Armenia 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 71 El Salvador 6.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Sri Lanka 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Cuba 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Mauritius 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Türkiye
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Türkiye?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Türkiye was 5.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 138.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Türkiye rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Türkiye ranks 72nd out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is up 632.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.