Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 33.33 % change on previous year in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Trinidad and Tobago, 1979–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Trinidad and Tobago is 33.33 % change on previous year, measured in 2010.
The figure is up 158.3% on the previous year and up 166.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 200 % change on previous year in 2002 and was at its lowest, -83.33 % change on previous year, in 2001.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 29th of 103 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | -50 % change on previous year | — |
| 2001 | -83.33 % change on previous year | +66.7% |
| 2002 | 200 % change on previous year | -340.0% |
| 2003 | -33.33 % change on previous year | -116.7% |
| 2004 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 50 % change on previous year | — |
| 2006 | 133.33 % change on previous year | +166.7% |
| 2007 | 28.57 % change on previous year | -78.6% |
| 2008 | -22.22 % change on previous year | -177.8% |
| 2009 | -57.14 % change on previous year | +157.1% |
| 2010 | 33.33 % change on previous year | -158.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 1980s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 2000s | 16.59 % change on previous year | -83.33 % change on previous year | 200 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.33 % change on previous year | 33.33 % change on previous year | 33.33 % change on previous year | 1 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 26 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 54.36 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Belize 50 % change on previous year compare
- 28 Timor-Leste 38.88 % change on previous year compare
- 30 Pakistan 30.56 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Uruguay 22.58 % change on previous year compare
- 32 Brazil 22.42 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2000)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 330,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 560,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 90,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 370,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 480,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 4.08 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Trinidad and Tobago was 33.33 % change on previous year in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 200 % change on previous year in 2002.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was -83.33 % change on previous year in 2001.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 29th out of 103 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is up 166.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.