Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in IDA blend

IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual was 14.82 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
14.82 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 30.9%
Rank
12th
of 44 groups
All-time high
186.71 % change on previous year
in 2005
All-time low
-51.09 % change on previous year
in 1993
Years of data
52
1971–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in IDA blend, 1971–2022

-50050100150200197119962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

IDA blend recorded 14.82 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in 2022.

The figure is up 30.9% on the previous year and up 341.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in IDA blend peaked at 186.71 % change on previous year in 2005 and was at its lowest, -51.09 % change on previous year, in 1993.

That places IDA blend 12th out of 44 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in IDA blend, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate in IDA blend, 1971 to 2022.
Year % change on previous year Change
1971 -43.3 % change on previous year
1972 27.95 % change on previous year -164.6%
1973 47.07 % change on previous year +68.4%
1974 71.21 % change on previous year +51.3%
1975 53.04 % change on previous year -25.5%
1976 6.9 % change on previous year -87.0%
1977 75.78 % change on previous year +998.8%
1978 -4.54 % change on previous year -106.0%
1979 22.32 % change on previous year -591.5%
1980 24.13 % change on previous year +8.1%
1981 -0.1073 % change on previous year -100.4%
1982 3.24 % change on previous year -3123.2%
1983 -7.66 % change on previous year -336.1%
1984 4.96 % change on previous year -164.7%
1985 -14.15 % change on previous year -385.4%
1986 60.52 % change on previous year -527.7%
1987 0.9191 % change on previous year -98.5%
1988 4.11 % change on previous year +346.7%
1989 -21.34 % change on previous year -619.6%
1990 18.83 % change on previous year -188.3%
1991 -37.26 % change on previous year -297.9%
1992 38.63 % change on previous year -203.7%
1993 -51.09 % change on previous year -232.2%
1994 17.45 % change on previous year -134.2%
1995 -5.78 % change on previous year -133.1%
1996 5.76 % change on previous year -199.7%
1997 -10.86 % change on previous year -288.6%
1998 -15.37 % change on previous year +41.5%
1999 -2.36 % change on previous year -84.6%
2000 14.45 % change on previous year -710.9%
2001 5.37 % change on previous year -62.9%
2002 44.33 % change on previous year +726.1%
2003 5.91 % change on previous year -86.7%
2004 1.15 % change on previous year -80.6%
2005 186.71 % change on previous year +16139.9%
2006 -49.47 % change on previous year -126.5%
2007 20.02 % change on previous year -140.5%
2008 17.88 % change on previous year -10.7%
2009 26.04 % change on previous year +45.7%
2010 30.98 % change on previous year +19.0%
2011 -32.81 % change on previous year -205.9%
2012 -6.13 % change on previous year -81.3%
2013 11.8 % change on previous year -292.5%
2014 -20.13 % change on previous year -270.6%
2015 -17.76 % change on previous year -11.8%
2016 -21.21 % change on previous year +19.4%
2017 33.85 % change on previous year -259.6%
2018 -13.75 % change on previous year -140.6%
2019 -11.91 % change on previous year -13.4%
2020 -15.46 % change on previous year +29.8%
2021 11.32 % change on previous year -173.2%
2022 14.82 % change on previous year +30.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 28.49 % change on previous year -43.3 % change on previous year 75.78 % change on previous year 9
1980s 5.46 % change on previous year -21.34 % change on previous year 60.52 % change on previous year 10
1990s -4.2 % change on previous year -51.09 % change on previous year 38.63 % change on previous year 10
2000s 27.24 % change on previous year -49.47 % change on previous year 186.71 % change on previous year 10
2010s -4.71 % change on previous year -32.81 % change on previous year 33.85 % change on previous year 10
2020s 3.56 % change on previous year -15.46 % change on previous year 14.82 % change on previous year 3

Countries ranked near IDA blend

  1. 9 Peru 91.44 % change on previous year compare
  2. 10 Sudan 83.4 % change on previous year compare
  3. 11 Romania 77.78 % change on previous year compare
  4. 12 Malaysia 77.09 % change on previous year compare
  5. 13 Palestine, State of 65.28 % change on previous year compare
  6. 14 Ghana 52.37 % change on previous year compare
  7. 15 Bulgaria 50.65 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend

All data for IDA blend →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in IDA blend?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in IDA blend was 14.82 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
The highest recorded value was 186.71 % change on previous year in 2005.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
The lowest recorded value was -51.09 % change on previous year in 1993.
How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual?
IDA blend ranks 12th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual rising or falling in IDA blend?
Over the last ten years it is up 341.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this IDA blend data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in IDA blend. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-blend/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in IDA blend</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 6,894 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.