Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics

Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2010)
3.13 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.9%
Rank
40th
of 44 groups
All-time high
42.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
All-time low
3.13 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Years of data
21
1990–2010

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2010

0102030401990200020101990: 28.7 current US$ per square kilometre1991: 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre1992: 42.3 current US$ per square kilometre1993: 25.2 current US$ per square kilometre1994: 36.8 current US$ per square kilometre1995: 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre1996: 16.7 current US$ per square kilometre1997: 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre1998: 20.2 current US$ per square kilometre1999: 7 current US$ per square kilometre2000: 7 current US$ per square kilometre2001: 20.5 current US$ per square kilometre2002: 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre2003: 17.5 current US$ per square kilometre2004: 17 current US$ per square kilometre2005: 14 current US$ per square kilometre2006: 13.5 current US$ per square kilometre2007: 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre2008: 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre2009: 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre2010: 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

Central Europe and the Baltics recorded 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 3.9% on the previous year and down 55.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 42.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.

That places Central Europe and the Baltics 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990 to 2010.
Year current US$ per square kilometre Change
1990 28.68 current US$ per square kilometre
1991 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre -73.2%
1992 42.33 current US$ per square kilometre +451.6%
1993 25.22 current US$ per square kilometre -40.4%
1994 36.81 current US$ per square kilometre +45.9%
1995 13.76 current US$ per square kilometre -62.6%
1996 16.75 current US$ per square kilometre +21.7%
1997 17.32 current US$ per square kilometre +3.4%
1998 20.16 current US$ per square kilometre +16.4%
1999 7.02 current US$ per square kilometre -65.2%
2000 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre +0.4%
2001 20.45 current US$ per square kilometre +190.1%
2002 17.64 current US$ per square kilometre -13.8%
2003 17.53 current US$ per square kilometre -0.6%
2004 16.98 current US$ per square kilometre -3.1%
2005 14.04 current US$ per square kilometre -17.3%
2006 13.54 current US$ per square kilometre -3.5%
2007 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre -53.7%
2008 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre -38.9%
2009 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre -15.0%
2010 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre -3.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 21.57 current US$ per square kilometre 7.02 current US$ per square kilometre 42.33 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre 20.45 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre 1

Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics

  1. 37 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre
  2. 38 Grenada 29.41 current US$ per square kilometre
  3. 39 Cambodia 26.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 40 Sudan 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre
  5. 41 Gambia 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 42 Kenya 25.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  7. 43 Seychelles 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 189 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics

All data for Central Europe and the Baltics →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics was 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
The highest recorded value was 42.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
The lowest recorded value was 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2010.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
Over the last ten years it is down 55.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.