Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per was 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Low income, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Low income is 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 4.9% on the previous year and up 10.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Low income peaked at 45.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
That places Low income 18th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.7504 current US$ per square kilometre | +1268.3% |
| 1989 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.3% |
| 1990 | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.6% |
| 1991 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1992 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1993 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1994 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.4% |
| 1995 | 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.7% |
| 1996 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1997 | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.8% |
| 1998 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.9% |
| 1999 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 2000 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.3% |
| 2001 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2002 | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.1% |
| 2003 | 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2004 | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 2005 | 19.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.1% |
| 2006 | 10.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 2007 | 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.8% |
| 2008 | 35.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.7% |
| 2009 | 37.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2010 | 45.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2011 | 23.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 2012 | 12.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.2% |
| 2013 | 6.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 2014 | 5.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2015 | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.4% |
| 2016 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.4% |
| 2017 | 9.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 2018 | 7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2019 | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2020 | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2021 | 9.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.9% |
| 2022 | 8.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2023 | 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2174 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 15 Cuba 103.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Ecuador 97.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Nicaragua 95.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Barbados 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Rwanda 79.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Jordan 77.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Syrian Arab Republic 62.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Low income was 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 45.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 18th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.