Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Czechia

Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -50 % change on previous year in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
-50 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 44.3%
World rank
120th
of 136 countries
All-time high
533.33 % change on previous year
in 1998
All-time low
-89.74 % change on previous year
in 2003
Years of data
10
1993–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Czechia, 1993–2004

02004006001993199820041993: -40 % change on previous year1994: -61.1 % change on previous year1995: 110.7 % change on previous year1996: -69.5 % change on previous year1997: -66.7 % change on previous year1998: 533.3 % change on previous year2001: 11.8 % change on previous year2002: 515.8 % change on previous year2003: -89.7 % change on previous year2004: -50 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Czechia recorded -50 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in 2004.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 44.3% on the previous year and up 18.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Czechia peaked at 533.33 % change on previous year in 1998 and was at its lowest, -89.74 % change on previous year, in 2003.

Czechia ranks 120th of 136 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Czechia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate in Czechia, 1993 to 2004.
Year % change on previous year Change
1993 -40 % change on previous year
1994 -61.11 % change on previous year +52.8%
1995 110.71 % change on previous year -281.2%
1996 -69.49 % change on previous year -162.8%
1997 -66.67 % change on previous year -4.1%
1998 533.33 % change on previous year -900.0%
2001 11.76 % change on previous year -97.8%
2002 515.79 % change on previous year +4284.2%
2003 -89.74 % change on previous year -117.4%
2004 -50 % change on previous year -44.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 67.8 % change on previous year -69.49 % change on previous year 533.33 % change on previous year 6
2000s 96.95 % change on previous year -89.74 % change on previous year 515.79 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 117 Fiji -38.14 % change on previous year compare
  2. 118 Maldives -38.47 % change on previous year compare
  3. 119 Angola -40.01 % change on previous year compare
  4. 121 Chile -50.71 % change on previous year compare
  5. 122 Libya -55 % change on previous year compare
  6. 123 Cuba -55.73 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Czechia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Czechia was -50 % change on previous year in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was 533.33 % change on previous year in 1998.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was -89.74 % change on previous year in 2003.
How does Czechia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
Czechia ranks 120th out of 136 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Czechia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/czechia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Czechia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.