Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Cuba
Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -55.73 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Cuba, 1971–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Cuba is -55.73 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 267.8% on the previous year and up 81.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Cuba peaked at 690.91 % change on previous year in 2008 and was at its lowest, -300 % change on previous year, in 2011.
That places Cuba 123rd out of 136 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 542.86 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 120 % change on previous year | -77.9% |
| 1973 | 80.81 % change on previous year | -32.7% |
| 1974 | 469.83 % change on previous year | +481.4% |
| 1975 | -2.35 % change on previous year | -100.5% |
| 1976 | 33.43 % change on previous year | -1520.9% |
| 1977 | 14.6 % change on previous year | -56.3% |
| 1978 | -48.92 % change on previous year | -435.1% |
| 1979 | 3.47 % change on previous year | -107.1% |
| 1980 | -52.3 % change on previous year | -1607.0% |
| 1981 | -91.93 % change on previous year | +75.8% |
| 1982 | 87.1 % change on previous year | -194.7% |
| 1983 | 165.52 % change on previous year | +90.0% |
| 1984 | 49.35 % change on previous year | -70.2% |
| 1985 | -23.04 % change on previous year | -146.7% |
| 1986 | 28.25 % change on previous year | -222.6% |
| 1987 | 73.13 % change on previous year | +158.9% |
| 1988 | -84.22 % change on previous year | -215.2% |
| 1989 | 469.36 % change on previous year | -657.3% |
| 1990 | -25.78 % change on previous year | -105.5% |
| 1991 | 3.44 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1992 | -57.56 % change on previous year | -1775.8% |
| 1993 | -56.52 % change on previous year | -1.8% |
| 1995 | -43.62 % change on previous year | -22.8% |
| 1996 | -68.72 % change on previous year | +57.5% |
| 1997 | -5.36 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1998 | -0.9434 % change on previous year | -82.4% |
| 1999 | 88.57 % change on previous year | -9488.6% |
| 2000 | -43.43 % change on previous year | -149.0% |
| 2001 | -27.68 % change on previous year | -36.3% |
| 2002 | 133.33 % change on previous year | -581.7% |
| 2003 | 36.51 % change on previous year | -72.6% |
| 2004 | 3.1 % change on previous year | -91.5% |
| 2005 | -65.04 % change on previous year | -2197.5% |
| 2006 | -1.08 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 2007 | -88.04 % change on previous year | +8088.0% |
| 2008 | 690.91 % change on previous year | -884.7% |
| 2009 | -85.06 % change on previous year | -112.3% |
| 2010 | -53.85 % change on previous year | -36.7% |
| 2011 | -300 % change on previous year | +457.1% |
| 2017 | 350.19 % change on previous year | -216.7% |
| 2018 | 25.67 % change on previous year | -92.7% |
| 2019 | 29.12 % change on previous year | +13.4% |
| 2020 | -1.29 % change on previous year | -104.4% |
| 2021 | 28.06 % change on previous year | -2276.5% |
| 2022 | -15.15 % change on previous year | -154.0% |
| 2023 | -55.73 % change on previous year | +267.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 134.86 % change on previous year | -48.92 % change on previous year | 542.86 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 62.12 % change on previous year | -91.93 % change on previous year | 469.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -18.5 % change on previous year | -68.72 % change on previous year | 88.57 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 55.35 % change on previous year | -88.04 % change on previous year | 690.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.23 % change on previous year | -300 % change on previous year | 350.19 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 2020s | -11.03 % change on previous year | -55.73 % change on previous year | 28.06 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 120 Czechia -50 % change on previous year compare
- 121 Chile -50.71 % change on previous year compare
- 122 Libya -55 % change on previous year compare
- 124 Madagascar -56.59 % change on previous year compare
- 125 Eritrea -58.9 % change on previous year compare
- 126 Poland -66.24 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Cuba?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Cuba was -55.73 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 690.91 % change on previous year in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -300 % change on previous year in 2011.
- How does Cuba rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Cuba ranks 123rd out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 81.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 47 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.