Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 21.68 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Ecuador, 1982–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Ecuador is 21.68 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 405.7% on the previous year and up 263.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Ecuador peaked at 877.39 % change on previous year in 2016 and was at its lowest, -93.95 % change on previous year, in 2017.
Ecuador ranks 41st of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1982 | 33.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 136.36 % change on previous year | +309.1% |
| 1984 | -84.62 % change on previous year | -162.1% |
| 1985 | 31.25 % change on previous year | -136.9% |
| 1986 | 14.29 % change on previous year | -54.3% |
| 1987 | 191.67 % change on previous year | +1241.7% |
| 1988 | -15.71 % change on previous year | -108.2% |
| 1989 | -23.73 % change on previous year | +51.0% |
| 1990 | 66.67 % change on previous year | -381.0% |
| 1991 | 265.33 % change on previous year | +298.0% |
| 1992 | 159.12 % change on previous year | -40.0% |
| 1993 | -79.01 % change on previous year | -149.7% |
| 1994 | 59.06 % change on previous year | -174.7% |
| 1995 | 55.27 % change on previous year | -6.4% |
| 1996 | -31.25 % change on previous year | -156.5% |
| 1997 | 25.3 % change on previous year | -180.9% |
| 1998 | -8.2 % change on previous year | -132.4% |
| 1999 | -51.2 % change on previous year | +524.3% |
| 2000 | -34.51 % change on previous year | -32.6% |
| 2001 | -58.06 % change on previous year | +68.3% |
| 2002 | 53.85 % change on previous year | -192.7% |
| 2003 | 75 % change on previous year | +39.3% |
| 2004 | 19.05 % change on previous year | -74.6% |
| 2005 | -15.2 % change on previous year | -179.8% |
| 2006 | -39.62 % change on previous year | +160.7% |
| 2007 | -21.88 % change on previous year | -44.8% |
| 2008 | 38 % change on previous year | -273.7% |
| 2009 | -18.84 % change on previous year | -149.6% |
| 2010 | -69.64 % change on previous year | +269.6% |
| 2011 | 52.94 % change on previous year | -176.0% |
| 2012 | -30.77 % change on previous year | -158.1% |
| 2013 | 5.97 % change on previous year | -119.4% |
| 2014 | 13.79 % change on previous year | +131.0% |
| 2015 | -6.77 % change on previous year | -149.1% |
| 2016 | 877.39 % change on previous year | -13055.9% |
| 2017 | -93.95 % change on previous year | -110.7% |
| 2018 | -1.29 % change on previous year | -98.6% |
| 2019 | -7.51 % change on previous year | +483.3% |
| 2020 | 105.42 % change on previous year | -1504.2% |
| 2021 | 253.97 % change on previous year | +140.9% |
| 2022 | -7.09 % change on previous year | -102.8% |
| 2023 | 21.68 % change on previous year | -405.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 35.36 % change on previous year | -84.62 % change on previous year | 191.67 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1990s | 46.11 % change on previous year | -79.01 % change on previous year | 265.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.2216 % change on previous year | -58.06 % change on previous year | 75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 74.02 % change on previous year | -93.95 % change on previous year | 877.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 93.5 % change on previous year | -7.09 % change on previous year | 253.97 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 38 Guinea-Bissau 24 % change on previous year compare
- 39 Mauritania 23.85 % change on previous year compare
- 40 Bhutan 22.61 % change on previous year compare
- 42 Mali 21.26 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Panama 20.09 % change on previous year compare
- 44 Togo 19.96 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Ecuador was 21.68 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 877.39 % change on previous year in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -93.95 % change on previous year in 2017.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Ecuador ranks 41st out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 263.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.