Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IBRD only

IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 16.33 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
16.33 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 21.8%
Rank
7th
of 46 groups
All-time high
131.29 % change on previous year
in 1973
All-time low
-36.56 % change on previous year
in 2007
Years of data
52
1971–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IBRD only, 1971–2022

-50050100150197119962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

IBRD only recorded 16.33 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in 2022.

That represents a change of down 21.8% on the previous year and up 268.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IBRD only peaked at 131.29 % change on previous year in 1973 and was at its lowest, -36.56 % change on previous year, in 2007.

That places IBRD only 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IBRD only, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate in IBRD only, 1971 to 2022.
Year % change on previous year Change
1971 45.87 % change on previous year
1972 6.59 % change on previous year -85.6%
1973 131.29 % change on previous year +1893.4%
1974 64.36 % change on previous year -51.0%
1975 86.85 % change on previous year +34.9%
1976 5.86 % change on previous year -93.3%
1977 14.45 % change on previous year +146.7%
1978 -14.81 % change on previous year -202.5%
1979 9.5 % change on previous year -164.1%
1980 18.93 % change on previous year +99.4%
1981 -21.48 % change on previous year -213.5%
1982 -3.79 % change on previous year -82.4%
1983 -16.51 % change on previous year +335.7%
1984 8.9 % change on previous year -153.9%
1985 -16.25 % change on previous year -282.6%
1986 64.94 % change on previous year -499.7%
1987 -25.28 % change on previous year -138.9%
1988 45.28 % change on previous year -279.1%
1989 62.35 % change on previous year +37.7%
1990 -15.01 % change on previous year -124.1%
1991 3.92 % change on previous year -126.1%
1992 65.65 % change on previous year +1576.4%
1993 -33.82 % change on previous year -151.5%
1994 34.41 % change on previous year -201.8%
1995 -17.65 % change on previous year -151.3%
1996 18.82 % change on previous year -206.6%
1997 -13.75 % change on previous year -173.1%
1998 -31.14 % change on previous year +126.4%
1999 10.37 % change on previous year -133.3%
2000 10.03 % change on previous year -3.3%
2001 -6.1 % change on previous year -160.9%
2002 -11.38 % change on previous year +86.5%
2003 25.28 % change on previous year -322.1%
2004 26.73 % change on previous year +5.7%
2005 -16.34 % change on previous year -161.1%
2006 88.66 % change on previous year -642.7%
2007 -36.56 % change on previous year -141.2%
2008 -3.05 % change on previous year -91.6%
2009 -9.92 % change on previous year +224.8%
2010 -7.85 % change on previous year -20.8%
2011 24.63 % change on previous year -413.6%
2012 -9.68 % change on previous year -139.3%
2013 4.77 % change on previous year -149.3%
2014 -5.6 % change on previous year -217.5%
2015 -29.67 % change on previous year +429.6%
2016 10.4 % change on previous year -135.1%
2017 4 % change on previous year -61.6%
2018 9.91 % change on previous year +147.8%
2019 -0.3837 % change on previous year -103.9%
2020 6.76 % change on previous year -1862.6%
2021 20.88 % change on previous year +208.7%
2022 16.33 % change on previous year -21.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 38.88 % change on previous year -14.81 % change on previous year 131.29 % change on previous year 9
1980s 11.71 % change on previous year -25.28 % change on previous year 64.94 % change on previous year 10
1990s 2.18 % change on previous year -33.82 % change on previous year 65.65 % change on previous year 10
2000s 6.73 % change on previous year -36.56 % change on previous year 88.66 % change on previous year 10
2010s 0.0528 % change on previous year -29.67 % change on previous year 24.63 % change on previous year 10
2020s 14.66 % change on previous year 6.76 % change on previous year 20.88 % change on previous year 3

Countries ranked near IBRD only

  1. 4 Solomon Islands 311.72 % change on previous year compare
  2. 5 Bulgaria 263.64 % change on previous year compare
  3. 6 Djibouti 249.35 % change on previous year compare
  4. 7 Dominican Republic 206.44 % change on previous year compare
  5. 8 Hungary 205.71 % change on previous year compare
  6. 9 Israel 180 % change on previous year compare
  7. 10 Türkiye 168.24 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More aid effectiveness data for IBRD only

All data for IBRD only →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IBRD only?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IBRD only was 16.33 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IBRD only?
The highest recorded value was 131.29 % change on previous year in 1973.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IBRD only?
The lowest recorded value was -36.56 % change on previous year in 2007.
How does IBRD only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
IBRD only ranks 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in IBRD only?
Over the last ten years it is up 268.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this IBRD only data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IBRD only. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ibrd-only/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IBRD only</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.