Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Türkiye
Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 168.24 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Türkiye, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Türkiye is 168.24 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 783.3% on the previous year and up 4,369.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Türkiye peaked at 442.86 % change on previous year in 1969 and was at its lowest, -680 % change on previous year, in 1985.
Türkiye ranks 10th of 136 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | -69.52 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | -116.09 % change on previous year | +67.0% |
| 1969 | 442.86 % change on previous year | -481.5% |
| 1970 | 112.5 % change on previous year | -74.6% |
| 1971 | 123.53 % change on previous year | +9.8% |
| 1975 | -127.19 % change on previous year | -203.0% |
| 1976 | 3.23 % change on previous year | -102.5% |
| 1977 | 43.33 % change on previous year | +1243.3% |
| 1978 | 411.76 % change on previous year | +850.2% |
| 1979 | -75.47 % change on previous year | -118.3% |
| 1984 | 80 % change on previous year | -206.0% |
| 1985 | -680 % change on previous year | -950.0% |
| 1986 | -66.67 % change on previous year | -90.2% |
| 1987 | -207.69 % change on previous year | +211.5% |
| 1988 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1989 | 45.5 % change on previous year | — |
| 1990 | 162.38 % change on previous year | +256.9% |
| 1991 | 336.76 % change on previous year | +107.4% |
| 1992 | -61.28 % change on previous year | -118.2% |
| 1993 | -3.48 % change on previous year | -94.3% |
| 1994 | 111.71 % change on previous year | -3311.7% |
| 1995 | 55.32 % change on previous year | -50.5% |
| 1996 | 15.62 % change on previous year | -71.8% |
| 1997 | -46.92 % change on previous year | -400.4% |
| 1998 | -57.59 % change on previous year | +22.7% |
| 1999 | 57.89 % change on previous year | -200.5% |
| 2000 | 75.33 % change on previous year | +30.1% |
| 2001 | -71.48 % change on previous year | -194.9% |
| 2002 | 121.33 % change on previous year | -269.7% |
| 2003 | -9.64 % change on previous year | -107.9% |
| 2004 | 20.67 % change on previous year | -314.4% |
| 2005 | 38.67 % change on previous year | +87.1% |
| 2006 | 29.08 % change on previous year | -24.8% |
| 2007 | 123.46 % change on previous year | +324.5% |
| 2008 | 1.38 % change on previous year | -98.9% |
| 2009 | 14.85 % change on previous year | +975.1% |
| 2010 | 53.5 % change on previous year | +260.3% |
| 2011 | 10.12 % change on previous year | -81.1% |
| 2012 | -13.47 % change on previous year | -233.1% |
| 2013 | 3.76 % change on previous year | -127.9% |
| 2014 | -3.63 % change on previous year | -196.3% |
| 2015 | -11.69 % change on previous year | +222.4% |
| 2016 | 31.34 % change on previous year | -368.1% |
| 2017 | -11.88 % change on previous year | -137.9% |
| 2018 | 20.7 % change on previous year | -274.2% |
| 2019 | 54.61 % change on previous year | +163.8% |
| 2020 | 31.75 % change on previous year | -41.9% |
| 2021 | -33.02 % change on previous year | -204.0% |
| 2022 | -24.62 % change on previous year | -25.4% |
| 2023 | 168.24 % change on previous year | -783.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 85.75 % change on previous year | -116.09 % change on previous year | 442.86 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1970s | 70.24 % change on previous year | -127.19 % change on previous year | 411.76 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1980s | -138.14 % change on previous year | -680 % change on previous year | 80 % change on previous year | 6 |
| 1990s | 57.04 % change on previous year | -61.28 % change on previous year | 336.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 34.37 % change on previous year | -71.48 % change on previous year | 123.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.34 % change on previous year | -13.47 % change on previous year | 54.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 35.59 % change on previous year | -33.02 % change on previous year | 168.24 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 7 Dominican Republic 206.44 % change on previous year compare
- 8 Hungary 205.71 % change on previous year compare
- 9 Israel 180 % change on previous year compare
- 11 Argentina 119.68 % change on previous year compare
- 12 Peru 112.4 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Côte d'Ivoire 108.8 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Türkiye
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Türkiye?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Türkiye was 168.24 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 442.86 % change on previous year in 1969.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was -680 % change on previous year in 1985.
- How does Türkiye rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Türkiye ranks 10th out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4,369.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.